Powered by KikBooks Widget

By on December 5, 2008, with 50 Comments

It seems LEGO finally recognized impossible object illusions as another great (optical illusion) way to promote their product. I’d like to think their inspiration came of this website – specially Escher Style category, but it’s much more likely they stumbled upon some of Andrew Lipson’s work, instead. I liked LEGO very much back being a kid, and have spent hours creating all sorts of incredible structures. I’m sorry it never occurred to me how fun would it be creating something like this. If you like these impossible creations, you’ll surely enjoy Lego Venice and these. Have to go now. Cya tomorrow!

Create The Impossible by LEGO
Create The Impossible by LEGO
Create The Impossible by LEGO

Comments

50 Responses
  1. Anonymous says:

    Very nice! I used to love Legos too. But also didn’t think about creating optical illusion!

    1st?

  2. Zoe :) says:

    These are great! I love LEGOs.

    First comment?

  3. penguin says:

    nice 1 (first)

  4. Stefano says:

    Davvero molto ben fatti.
    Complimenti a Lego e soprattutto Escher ;-)

  5. mathew says:

    first lol

  6. Anonymous says:

    This is soooo cool!
    first comment YAY!

    • MM says:

      This “first comment” game is getting ridiculous!
      Will you all please concentrate on the illusion more than concentrating on being first?!

  7. Twilite says:

    AWESOME!!!!

  8. Gagandeep says:

    cool

  9. Anonymous says:

    That’s amzing and very well done!!

  10. spazzingbean says:

    love it!!

  11. Anonymous says:

    Really cool!! i love impossible objects.

  12. Anonymous says:

    YES FIRST ONE! OH YEA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! awsome pic.

  13. Anonymous says:

    Thats Pretty Cool. They never had that when i played with legos. I am the first

  14. bufar says:

    These are cool, but fake. The shapes above the waterfall don’t even look like LEGO pieces.

  15. Anonymous says:

    Kewl, but these are Photoshopped examples for their advertising campaign. I don’t think they can be built.

  16. Anonymous says:

    FIRST COMMENT??? WELL THIS IS MY FIRST TIME COMMENTING ON THIS WEBSITE. I DONT REALLY GET THE SECOND ONE BUT I WANTED TO SAY THAT MY BROTHER IS LIKE 20 AND HE STILL PLAYS WITH LEGOS! LOL I LOOOVE UR WEBSITE AND CHECK IT EVERYDAY SO KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK. ALSO, HOW DO WE SEND EMAILS TO YOU???

  17. Anonymous says:

    Those are sweet
    First Comment!

  18. RaMpaNTe says:

    Really cool… but not original. I mean we’ve seen houndreds of photos and paintings like that.

    -1 for Lego.

  19. Anonymous says:

    Yes Rampante – that’s the point – they are based on Escher’s work – it’s funny because it’s Lego doing its verion of very famous illusions and art work. Fantastic stuff lego people, I don’t care if it’s Photoshopped or real – either way it’s creative and art!!

  20. Luca says:

    Woot! those are all MC Escher drawings in reality!
    Everyone google MC Escher’s
    Relativity
    Waterfall

  21. Anonymous says:

    I can’t believe you people still go one with the 1st! thing. No, you’re not first as the first few comments are delayed and displayed at the same time, and even if you were no one gives a damn. Grow up.
    Nice Lego kits, it’s actually hard to tell which parts are photoshopped.

  22. Luca says:

    Course they’re not original. They’re Lego representations of MC Escher work. The first one is waterfall. Third is Relativity. Not sure what second one is tho..

    Also, ya, they can’t actually be built. Just pay attention to the zig-zag slide and the poles in the second one.
    Also the direction of the stairs in the 3rd one.

  23. Phludens says:

    Not Photoshopped….

    http://www.andrewlipson.com/lego.htm

    most of these pictures have been up since 2003

  24. Evanderiel says:

    It’s very funny to see how many “first comment” there are… It’s always a competition for you

    However, I love LEGOs. They are amazing. The imagea are obviously photoshopped (or made in a shape that from one point of view appear as we see), because “impossible object illusions” are… well… impossible to create in real life, but they are very nice.

    I love LEGO videogames too…

  25. Drummyralf says:

    bufar: Those are roofpieces, and are possible to make.

    Of course, the rest is photoshopped, but that doesn’t make it anything less entertaining.

    Or it’s just a weird angle picture, like the buildable impossible triangle papercraft: http://gollum999.blogspot.com/2007/11/impossible-triangle.html

    But I don’t really think that’s the case with this picture ;)

  26. Tuck says:

    I’ve seen these before. They’re made with a combination of legos and camera magic because, of course, you can’t actually make these structures in real life. Just thought it should be pointed out that these are not exactly what they seem.
    http://www.andrewlipson.com/escher/waterfall.html for how they did it

  27. Ruud says:

    Very well done! I really like lego. My most favorite toy as a kid and I stil like it, but I never play with it anymore though.

    Comment from bufar about the shapes above the waterfall being false. I don’t think so. I recognise the rooftiles-legopieces I still have in my collection. With special legopieces you can make a cubelike shape with them.

    The second photo I don’t get either. Anyone out there whome can explane it to me?

    Thanks!

  28. Ruud says:

    PS.

    Ooohhh… I just got the second photo. The building seems to build stretching to the right and at the sametime to the back. the rightside is beïng emphasised by the ladder and the backside is being emphasised by the black legoman with helmed.

    Perhaps my English is not so clear, but it is not my native language. I’m dutch.

  29. Superbun says:

    simple realy, if u moved the camera angle slightly u could see how it was done, although it was still pretty cool, actualy i would like to see them from a diferent angle.

    p.s. this is my first comment,
    p.p.s love the site

  30. Sean says:

    First comment!

    Love the illusion!

  31. Enigma says:

    The second picture that a few people say they don’t ‘get’ is an interpretation of one of Eschers finest plays on perspective and is titled ‘Belvadere’ (the 2nd story of the building has its long side running left to right but the 1st floor runs front to back…)
    The illusion is clearer in Eschers drawing but still fantastic to see in Lego

  32. Anonymous says:

    I don’t get wht the last one is impossible? =/

  33. Anonymous says:

    No offence to you americans, but i know it’s really called ‘lego’ not ‘legos’

  34. sonja.doeller says:

    They are SO cool

  35. Chuck Norris says:

    Wow, first fail. I’m going to find and roundhouse kick the anyone who replied first.

  36. TheTruth says:

    Anonymous, nobody cares what you “know”, especially when you can’t spell “offense” right.

    … yeah.

  37. someone says:

    1st 1 and 3rd 1 i got, but 2nd i didn’t

  38. anon says:

    uhh everyone doing the first thing after the first two comments were poking fun.
    all are takes of Eschers.

  39. spaceface says:

    @TheTruth: do your research before you tell someone he’s wrong. type “define: offence” in google and voila! English != (is not equal to) American, there are a lot of words that are spelt differently.

    …yup.

  40. who wants to know says:

    awsome, i figured out that its all about the angle on these, at the angle they took the picture it looks like it, at least i think

  41. Kris says:

    that last one isnt impossible… I made it before

  42. Me, Myself, and iPod says:

    R those real??

  43. Coral Losesr says:

    WOW, I’m a big fan of legos.
    I seen an illusion like this a few months ago. The legso don’t really connect

  44. the b-sharps says:

    theres no way out.
    hey coral, do u like penuts?

  45. Lolzatater=] says:

    I wanna do that =3 I ud use by bros lego lol

Speak Your Mind

You can add some images too.

Pinterest