Sideway Face Optical Illusion

Here’s a disturbing photo-manipulation that has been circulating Facebook for some time now. I couldn’t ignore all the requests for it to be featured no more. It’s like more than a dozen of you have submitted it to me over the last week. At first I wasn’t that impressed, but as I kept re-checking the pic each time someone re-sent it to me, finally have I seen the illusion! Even-though this photo has been heavily manipulated, the illusion stands perfect! So, what do you make of it? Do you see the man standing sideways (profile), or do you see it as a partial frontal shot (a portrait)? It works both ways! Perhaps them police officers in charge of taking mug-shots of criminals could re-think their practice and go with this new approach to save film :D Something similar we have already featured before, but this one works much better, I think! BTW another take on this illusion can be seen inside this article (if you read this off of homepage).


Click Here for a RANDOM Optical Illusion

38 Replies to “Sideway Face Optical Illusion”

  1. maybe it’s because I’m a portrait artist, or maybe people are just easily impressed and like to circulate things on facebook, but these don’t really look convincing enough as profile shots to make for a compelling image. The lower one just looks weird due to the eye obviously being shopped in to an otherwise normal photo, and in that regard it doesn’t really work as a profile or straight on shot.

  2. Hmmm, if they would cap the photo at the neckline, it would be more believable. They shoulders give it away that it is the frontal not profile. Still worthy illusion.

  3. Quite good, can see the idea but in both cases the nose is definitley wrong – needs more work to make it really a good illusion.

  4. I was looking at it for about ten seconds, looked away, then looked back, and saw the face to the side instead of head-on. Kinda blew my mind a little. The second one is not as effective, though.

  5. I don’t buy it either. It is an interesting concept but these images are not well crafted enough to even be called an illusion, in my eye.

    It’s true you can pick out features of both profile and straight on shots, but they are just that: either/or. In order to achieve the “duality” of being able to realize the image in both directions, the facial features all must be able to fit into both worlds. They need to be something more than just a “pasted on eyeball.” As it is now, it just looks like a weird Picasso effect, like somebody else mentioned here.

  6. I like the first picture. The second one just photoshoped from two pictures with the turned eye and nose.
    But thumbs up for the first one.

  7. This is pretty much the essence of cubism, so it deserve good marks, even if it isn’t illusionistic.

    (There were cubists other than Picasso, as I’m sure you all know.)

  8. what’s really cool to me personally is that i saw the sideways guy first and it took mem like 5 minutes to see him standing straight when i feel like most people would see it the other way around…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *