By on September 30, 2011, with 200 Comments

Couple of days ago, Luca has pointed me to the photo of Spanish minister Carme Chacón published on El Pais website. At first I couldn’t see anything strange in it, yet after I’ve read the title of Luca’s email (same as above) – it triggered my attention. Finally, after few moments I’ve noticed that minister’s feet were actually inverted one to another!

It seems as if her left leg ends with the right leg’s foot. Same goes for her right leg. At first I considered this yet another shameful Photoshop disaster, which I immediately forwarded to fellow webmaster who collects these. Yet, the twist came after I was explained there is actually nothing wrong with the photo itself! I couldn’t believe the photo was actually a “mere” optical illusion.

What has happened, is that Carme covered her left thigh in a way where it appears it’s pointing left, instead of it actually pointing up. This photo has been featured in several world sites as a wrong retouch, but after all the false spotlight it received, the agency who took the shoot explained how the legs were actually not crossed at all! I’m not sure I managed to explain what is happening here, but be sure to check the solution I created with help of the Photoshop (below) – it’s still hard to imagine, yet it should explain the illusion.

Comments

200 Responses
  1. AshtonC1997 says:

    AHH I didn’t notice the creeper in the window until someone pointed it out!! That’s so freaking creepy! Now I’m scared… :o

  2. PK says:

    No one else noticed the weird creepy guy in the window???????????????????????? That’s what I noticed, but in the explanation, he kept saying something about her legs, and I am like, WHAT????? While there is some creepy stalker guy in the window!!!

  3. LD says:

    Creepy how the brain tries to fix that…

  4. Maths Rules! says:

    That’s kind of Creepy and hi Ms Dimos.

  5. jessica says:

    lol she has a pair of scisors in her hand

  6. Deano says:

    whats, no one noticed her hand on her thigh… thats a horrible blend job… pshhhh

  7. lala says:

    her hand is erased??

  8. Steven says:

    they arnt crossed look at her legs shadow… major fail

  9. Haleigh says:

    There’s also a face in the window behind her. O thought that’s what the thing was about…it’s kind if creepy…

  10. just saying, your a dumbass. says:

    you must be super dumb. thats not even the part your supposed to see! theres a face in the window.and the ones above this comment, all the ways up to “Jessica”, your idiots.

  11. Sarada says:

    sorry about my name there. hi c it supergoodmovies.com

  12. April says:

    People need to be more concerned with the lack of health on this girl. EAT SOME CHICKEN!

  13. bacour says:

    This is ridiculous. There is no optical illusion here. I actually had to read the description just to figure out what they were talking about and even then it took me a minute to figure out why anyone would think this. Absolutely ridiculous.

    • Anynomous says:

      Absolutely ridiculous – there is no “illusion” here – I had to read the post intensely before I even understood what you were going on about.

  14. Jeff says:

    I too had to read the description to “see” what the author saw in this photo. Only an idiot would see an illusion in this; her legs are just crossed. If this confuses you, please buy a helmet and don’t have children.

  15. Ding says:

    no no no, there is no way this is just an optical illusion. The picture taken to “prove” this fact only disproves it. In the second photo, the knees are level, and it is likely the legs are swapped behind the hands, but in the first photo, her knee is a few inches above the other, making a mere “optical illusion” impossible. Sorry, but I’m convinced this has been heavily p-shopped.

  16. Andrew says:

    i dont get it… her legs are crossed at the ankles.
    where’s the illusion?
    it does however look like someone’s painted a blob on her left knee.

  17. Richard Bond says:

    It seems that some of the commenters are not getting the photo, the skin to the right is not the uper side of her leg it is really the underside and a small portion of her ass.

    • Damion Yates says:

      Thank you! This was the key for me, even after following their explanation which made some sense, my eyes were unable to see quite why her leg still looked so crooked, that is until your comment.

  18. me with tht face says:

    i get it her legs r not crossed just beside each other and to make her seem profetional they make her arm i certin way to hide the leg and make it look crossed

  19. Willy says:

    Very well explained, as I was really confused and my mother tongue is not English and I’ve been able to understand what’s happening. Thank you!

  20. Andrew J. Coleman says:

    TOTAL FAIL!!!

  21. PVC Bending says:

    i don’t think i see what they’re trying to show. it just looks like someone sucks at using the clone stamp.

  22. LookintheBack says:

    does anyone else see the face in the background?

  23. Love is patient, love is kind.
    It does not envy,
    it does not boast,
    it is not proud.
    It is not rude,
    it is not self-seeking,
    it is not easily angered,
    it keeps no record of wrongs.
    Love does not delight in evil
    but rejoices with the truth.
    It always protects,
    always trusts,
    always hopes,
    always perseveres.

  24. thiago says:

    nuss” olha o rosto la atraz ‘ my god’

  25. David Willis says:

    Get a freaking life Vurdlaknippleless.jpg

  26. Gippo says:

    Damn))))))))))

  27. Mekana says:

    I’ve seen much worse. One bad one I saw was a bones poster and one of the girls had an extra finger!

  28. GraphicDesigner says:

    Here it is!
    Clear as day folks. The Picture, NOT photoshopped!

    387468_264236026970978_100001537499250_695733_966792060_n.jpg

    • yaagdmrn says:

      You’ve got your left and right mixed up. Her left arm rests on her left leg, and her right arm rests on her left arm.

  29. BCOMMTV says:

    Nah, that’s not an illusion, I’m not buying the excuse. That’s a PS FAIL. Left thigh, left knee, not adding up. The reenactment ain’t the same. M2C

  30. anthony says:

    wa wa wa …what a comment

  31. I clicked on a chick with boobs and ass to get this fuking site. WTF ?

  32. evan says:

    graphicdesigner: your conclusion is correct, but outline number 3 is incorrect. You outlined the lower part of her right leg and the upper part of her left leg and left buttock. You cannot outline her entire right leg since it crosses over her left and is not in view.

    • yaagdmrn says:

      “graphicdesigner: your conclusion is correct, but outline number 3 is incorrect. You outlined the lower part of her right leg and the upper part of her left leg and left buttock. You cannot outline her entire right leg since it crosses over her left and is not in view.”

      Evan, you are a cretin. Her legs are not crossed — if they were, her feet would be backwards. Outline number 3 is correct — an outline of her left leg, which is tight against her right leg — they do not cross. This is really quite straightforward for reasonably intelligent people … but there are numerous morons who still think it’s photoshopped, her legs are crossed, etc. even after it has been clearly explained.

  33. AjP says:

    @ Graphic one your heads on straight its just a light illusion the pics the real McCoy ,’-) I do graphic design too all the way in Namibia

  34. akki says:

    i can also do this but stil thinking how

  35. apo says:

    OWWW yEAHH very sexy

  36. an12345 says:

    but i think her right arm is more weird at her elbow.

  37. paul says:

    wtf do you mean her legs are not crossed! They clearly are! Unless of course her toes are reversed on her feet. This is F’n stupid. if her legs were not crossed then there would actually be something worth looking at because thhat would mean she has freaky reverse toes. This picture is totally normal and unremarkable.

  38. Hunter says:

    Wwwooooowww do u see the fac e in the back round

  39. Agustin Lagoleña says:

    Ok, it’s true, it’s a trick photo.

    It’s been manipulated so only gay people can see the face in the background.

  40. Big B says:

    did u all see one of her hand is missing in the main pic

  41. radhika says:

    very well done……..

  42. Rubberbandman says:

    Took we a while 2 c y this pic looks so messed up, i c it now. Probably took so long cuz i kept staring @ her legs. Damn!

  43. efff emmm all says:

    idont get the pic really her legs look crossed

    ido see the face in the background so obviously big b has eye sight issues or is insecure

    and as for the whole photo ive already wasted too much of my time reading these comments basically all saying the same thing

  44. Shakell says:

    This is so difficult to comprehend…I can totally see why thighs crossed + shins crossing back over and arms crossed could be soooo incredibly hard to understand.

    WTF is wrong with people?
    There is nothing at all about this photo even remotely interesting, except that she picked a very weird pose, and she’s flexible.

  45. Unknown what to said about the instigated of today.

  46. moe says:

    who cares?

  47. Amadeus says:

    You guys are completely lame. There is absolutely nothing wrong with the picture. She is simply crossing her legs. It’s lame how people easily get confused these days. Stay off the internet unless you like getting scammed. You guys are easy targets.

  48. magg says:

    y’all are stupid…the pic is made to look like her legs are crossed. IF they are, her toes are on backward…….look at the toes people…..

  49. Annonymus says:

    All I noticed was voldomort in the window… amiright?

  50. shawn says:

    Did any body eles see the face in tbe window

  51. Ertekaz says:

    Wow nice tips. We have to care when we changing something in photoshop.

  52. jeunesse says:

    WTF creepy and weird.

  53. lolnope says:

    wtf I don’t see anything weird about this picture besides the guy in the window.

  54. Damon says:

    The legs weren’t really crossed. The left hand that held the knee had covered the joint. On top of that, excessive lighting places at an lower angle coming from the left of model (right of picture) had caused an overburnt to left of model. distorting the original shadow cast on the thigh. Comparing the skin tone of the other picture (non-minister) the lady had darker shadow on the skin of her thigh as compare to the skin on her leg.

    Sometimes inappropriate use of lighting can caused unnecessary illusions or at times, deliberate illusions.

  55. Keszei says:

    Does anyone else notice that scary face in the window above the sign, looks like a ghost

  56. led sign says:

    her knee is a few inches above the other, making a mere “optical illusion” impossible. Sorry, but I’m convinced this has been heavily p-shopped

  57. LeanbodyExtreme says:

    This photo has been featured in several world sites as a wrong retouch, but after all the false spotlight it received,

  58. hahahhahahahah.very funny work…

  59. Adam says:

    I can see the issue you mention.
    If anyone else isn’t sure where to look, it’s the part of the thigh between her hands. It does look like it’s been messed with. I think there was probably an issue where the under part of her thigh was showing a bit more than she would have liked so somebody has moved it around a bit but because of what they’ve done they made her leg joint seem wrong.

    It’s really odd, but there definately looks like some odd dithering going on near that joint.

  60. siddu says:

    any body online
    chat with me

  61. jenny says:

    the pic is made to look like her legs are crossed. IF they are, her toes are on backward…….look at the toes people…..
    directions of toes are on the wrong.

  62. cdaddy says:

    ur all idiots 1 pic she’s not wearing a ring!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ur looking at the wrong thing! do i win a prize?

  63. AndreaSynks says:

    Her arms are like sticks, HOW CAN SHE BE SO SKINNY?!?!

  64. sid says:

    she is really gud at editing.

  65. Lily says:

    All of you people who say this isn’t an illusion are idiots. So what if it’s been photoshopped, it doesn’t change the fact that THERE IS an illusion. Look at her left knee; don’t you see that it looks a bit out of place if you try to connect it with her right thigh?

    And LOOK CLOSELY. Think before you speak; and understand the illusion before posting comments. It’s rude. And most of you are getting the wrong idea, it’s not about the creepy stalker or the ring or the scissor.

  66. Ke says:

    What about the creepy face in the back!

  67. Kablonet says:

    Very interesting image. Photoshop is dangeruos. :)

  68. SHAEED says:

    please pull down your cloth

  69. Donald Reid says:

    Has it ocurred to anyone other than me that this question could be totally resolved by contacting the lady woman in the photo on Skype and asking her to chgange into short shorts and stand in front of her web cam bare footed.

  70. The Troller says:

    what is voldemort doing in the muggle world :troll:

  71. xP says:

    Her legs dosen’t even look wrong! This whole thing is just fucked up O.o There’s no wrong with the picture :S

  72. xP says:

    Ooooh, NOW I see it ._.

  73. I don't like u but, says:

    The creepy dude in the window, and her waist is gone. You are welcome! :) <3

  74. MrCead says:

    Her legs are not crossed, she’s just extremely skinny. The hard shadow from her arms/hands just makes the leg “look” as if they are crossed.

    But in the grand scheme of things, why is there a debate on the matter?

  75. lovely says:

    the other girl needs to eat a sammich! she is waaaay to skinny

  76. jaja says:

    wat da fuc… how can no bodies say bad things about hot chicks

Speak Your Mind

You can add some images too.