By on September 30, 2011, with 200 Comments

Couple of days ago, Luca has pointed me to the photo of Spanish minister Carme Chacón published on El Pais website. At first I couldn’t see anything strange in it, yet after I’ve read the title of Luca’s email (same as above) – it triggered my attention. Finally, after few moments I’ve noticed that minister’s feet were actually inverted one to another!

It seems as if her left leg ends with the right leg’s foot. Same goes for her right leg. At first I considered this yet another shameful Photoshop disaster, which I immediately forwarded to fellow webmaster who collects these. Yet, the twist came after I was explained there is actually nothing wrong with the photo itself! I couldn’t believe the photo was actually a “mere” optical illusion.

What has happened, is that Carme covered her left thigh in a way where it appears it’s pointing left, instead of it actually pointing up. This photo has been featured in several world sites as a wrong retouch, but after all the false spotlight it received, the agency who took the shoot explained how the legs were actually not crossed at all! I’m not sure I managed to explain what is happening here, but be sure to check the solution I created with help of the Photoshop (below) – it’s still hard to imagine, yet it should explain the illusion.

Comments

200 Responses
  1. Rick says:

    nope, still don’t c it !, this is the 1st illusion that “actually” stumped me.

  2. Zrowny says:

    nice! Also about the cinemographs, I think they are very cool. I would love to see more of them.

    • Mark says:

      @Zrowny: try going to http://www.google.com and type cinemographs in the box you see and then hit enter. You’ll find lots of pages with more cinemographs. You could also press the ‘pictures’ option you see on the left to jump directly to cinemograph pictures. Or you could wait for Mighty Optical Illusions to post more cinemographs. search-box-design-things-to-keep-in-mind

  3. Rob says:

    It took me awhile to see the illusion… I understand, but it didn’t ever look like her legs were crossed, just her ankles….

  4. Aeros says:

    I didn’t get it at first then it hit me. Very awesome!

  5. RuloCore says:

    Hi! I’m from Catalonia, where this woman is, and I have to say that it shocked me :O
    But I also have to say that this woman is making a good progress in militar matters!

  6. Marty_Mtl says:

    Allo ! daily viewer here, and long live the MOIllusion site !! keep the good work ! ..now regarding this illusion , I have to say its a good one , glad you posted it , being not created to be an illusion, but rather a “natural” one out of reality, I got puzzled !!
    Cheers to you !!
    marty_mtl

  7. matijs says:

    Perfect, i just love that kind of illusions, which takes some brains to understand :)

  8. fossda says:

    photoshop, but not photoshop fail.

  9. Rob says:

    Wow, this is really disorienting. This is the stuff I love – seemingly “normal” images that create an optical illusion.

  10. clozecall says:

    I see it in the 2nd picture with the white skirt. @Rick, look at her left knee (leg in front) in the picture with the white skirt, it looks like her left leg is coming out of her right leg, and not resting on top.

  11. benni says:

    what? I don’t get it at all. :(

  12. Care Bear says:

    Now that definately qualifies as weird.

  13. kapnui says:

    I bet she stubs her toes a lot.

  14. David says:

    I love this, it’s a proper Optical illusion
    More please

  15. Alexandre says:

    The shadows of her hands helped a lot with the illusion of crossed legs.

  16. person says:

    Does anybody see what looks like a face in the window

  17. Frizlab says:

    Very good illusion! I’m stunned.
    But I don’t like cinemographs.

  18. Ribber says:

    Nothing more enjoyable than having to stare at a lovely pair of legs…

    The vertical shadow that is a combination of the cease in her bent knee and her left wrist really intensifies the illusion!

    While it’s pretty easy to see the legs both ways, it’s a lot more fun looking at them reversed :P

  19. Julia says:

    Cool, but look into the window (if ther was a window :s) And it looks like a head there, with mouth and eyes xP

  20. john says:

    nice gams…

  21. LGD-W says:

    I could only see it after I looked at your ‘solution’. Great job!

  22. Adam says:

    Very cool. I had to re-read this many times and look at the pictures multiple times to fully understand but basically, in the real photo we think we’re looking at the side of her left leg crossed under her right leg when it’s actually the underside of her left leg which just goes up and back down. She’s blocking the rest of her leg with her arm on her knee.

  23. leperchaun says:

    That`s so cool!! At 1st I didn`t get it then I saw it! o_0

  24. confused and curious says:

    At first, I thought the illusion was the face of a man up on the glass, located behind the woman…..is that a real guy or just an illusion or something else?!?

  25. Karan says:

    Wow!! It is an optical illusion!! My GOD I was fooled at first too!1 Nice catch Vurdlak!!

  26. savants08 says:

    It’s just an illusion, and coincidence I think. After taking a second glance you can see her legs are not crossed just simply raised and crossed at the ankles. It tricked me at first I admit!

  27. Shortie says:

    Wasn’t until I looked at your photoshoped version that I got it. To those who fail to see it still.

    The sleeve of her top (Left hand) covers a part of her thigh, making it look as if the thigh we can see is part of her left leg, when in fact it is her right leg.

    The leg in the foreground is attached to the thigh and at no stage crosses over the other legs thigh/knee (only at the ankles do the legs cross)

    Very, very! Clever.

  28. PromiseMe says:

    Is is just me or are her feet HUGE?

  29. jarod says:

    dude, theres a really creepy looking guy in the background at the top, above the different languages next to her head.

  30. maria says:

    does anyone see the face in the door in the back?

  31. emy says:

    am i the only one who sees the person at the very top in the middle?

  32. michael says:

    if you dont get it try and do her position at on the first photo… it is actually quite difficult until you go to the pics afterwards

  33. Madison says:

    There’s also a scary face in the window of the first picture. :D

  34. Ben says:

    That is awesome. Such a simple little thing creates a forever mind boggling illusion. I must show this to all my friends.

  35. Tom says:

    Yea it took a few goes to see the illusion but it’s definitely real. When you look hard at the photoshopped example where her left arm is missing, you can see where her leg does actually point up giving the impression her legs are crossed in a weird way.

  36. Dolphin says:

    Ha ha,cool. Love it. And the cinemographs are cool. It would be very nice to see more.

  37. josh says:

    anyone notice the creepy looking guy at the top of the photo

  38. Eric says:

    I thought it had something to do with the couch having an empty spot xD

  39. DudeMan says:

    Nice find! I wouldn’t have noticed anything strange about this photo if it wasn’t pointed out to me.

  40. Dave says:

    Nice one.

  41. Glidos says:

    Now I do like this one. Sort of double bluff of an illusion.

    Also, just to redress the ballance a little, I also like the cinemographs. I wouldn’t necessarily call them illusions, but they do give a striking effect. I’d rather see a few of them every now and then, rather than 100 flavours of Penrose’s stairs.

  42. sharon says:

    to me it just looks like a shadow on her leg from her sleeve and makes it look like she has a false leg its quite briliant really

  43. Chenoa Zephyra says:

    You did a FANTASTIC job explaining the illusion Vurdlak; you always do! Nice work and I did think her legs were crossed the whole time!!

    • Chenoa Zephyra says:

      I meant to say that “I THOUGHT her legs were crossed the whole time”… Not “I think”….

      Keep up the nice work!!

  44. Ron C says:

    “legs were actually not crossed at all!” Okay now I see it. Oh, BTW, who is the man looking in the window?

  45. Stan says:

    This one took a while to understand. I kept concentrating on her FEET because of the explanation.
    It’s just that it appears that her left knee goes UNDER her right knee and that her legs are crossed – when they aren’t. This is good. It forced me to be perceptive.

  46. Flupty says:

    The second picture seems to also be an optical illusion, her hip on the right side seems to be non-existant.

  47. Madelon says:

    Is no one seeing the face in the glass in the background? :O

  48. steve says:

    Yeah, it would have been weird too.. if the other leg was over it wouldn’t touch the ground.

  49. Peter says:

    If you don’t get it, think about how her legs would have to be positioned if she has crossed them only at the ankles. The photo makes it It look like she has crossed her legs above the knees (combination of angle and position of her left hand covering the knee) which is what leads you to think her feet are on backwards.

  50. ellis says:

    looks like her legs are crossed twice, once above the knee and once at the ankles.

  51. Venture Free says:

    If think about where her right thigh would have to be, it would actually be weirder if her legs were in fact crossed. But of course that’s the point of illusions. Our intuition is giving us the “wrong” answer.

  52. Luis says:

    Now I get it! It took quite long to understand what you menat. For me it was obvious the way her legs were positioned. Maybe there’s other people for whom the crossed legs is the obvious one.

  53. Tara U says:

    I saw this one right away. But I clean photos for a living. X3

  54. Nagaji says:

    One of the best; astounding in its effectiveness and simplicity.

  55. Artemis Fowl says:

    ???
    Wait…
    I GET IT!!

  56. Nicolas says:

    Optical Ilussion?? It seems that you’re running out of material…

    • George says:

      What!? This is what’s known as a “reach”! The only thing wrong in this picture is how badly malnourished Carme Chacón looks.

  57. eee efff geee says:

    OH I get it I think those aren’t her legs, Cause if you look in the first picture Look at the knees and the legs where they start read the description a little harder :D

  58. Gail Z says:

    I think what you seeing is because she is able to cross her legs at the knees, and also at the ankles. If you look at it from
    that perspective view, you will be able to tell that its not incorrectly photoshopped nor is it an illusion. You have to have some pretty long legs to do this. None of which I have.

    • kevin says:

      this is cracking me up, if she actually were crossing her legs above the knees and at ankles then that would mean that she was born with her left foot and right foot on wrong side… are people just ignoring here toes being in wrong place?

  59. Ace says:

    This optical illusion is on-par with the animated GIF files. Do I need to stand on my head and cross my eyes to see it?

  60. Ajidicia says:

    Absolutly amazing !
    even now, i still believe that she crossed her legs above the knees (and under which is obvious) but in fact she realy crossed her legs only once (under knees).
    The shades from her hands are guilty !

    • anon says:

      That was obvious to me that her legs were only crossed once… I had a hard time trying to see what was supposed to seem like it was Photoshopped… And it still doesn’t make sense that people would see it like that, Guess i just have a weird mind or something

  61. JD says:

    It just goes to show and prove you should believe little of what you see, hear and read on the Net!

  62. jessica says:

    i understand how the legs look different but how come the feet still look weird???

  63. croat4life says:

    @rick in the 1st one the feet look at the feet!!!!

  64. brooks masterton says:

    I believe the black clothing that hides any contour contributes to the strenght of the effect of this “illusion”. I appreciate the solution pictures. a very stronge effect. Even knowing the solution I still see the leges as reversed ( especially when I look at the feet)

  65. Ron says:

    I didn’t see how her legs couldn’t be crossed until I saw the photoshopped pic with her hand “removed”. Good one.

  66. Danielle says:

    Wow it took me a few minutes but I finally figured it out! Weird!

  67. kevin says:

    Wow… mind-boggling.

  68. heatfan says:

    i was looking at the guys face in the window

  69. Ivan says:

    OMG U GUYS SEE THE GUY IN THE BACK>! sCARy

    • David Blair says:

      Is that a painting of a face in the background or someone standing outside of a window, or could it be something Supernatural???? I don’t really believe in stuff like that but to me, it does Not look like a painting or someone looking through a window!!! It really freaked me out when I first noticed it!!!! To be honest, it still kind of freaks me out! LMAO!!!! I saved the pic on my PC, and then I opened it and zoomed in on the face and it looked even more freaky up close! I don’t have a clue what it is!!!!!!!
      FREAKY

  70. ELIAS TANGUMA says:

    IT CAN ALL BE JUST A TRICK OF THE LIGHTS AND ANGLE BUT IF SO, THAN THE TRUE OPTICAL ILLUSSION IS THE GHOST IN THE BACKROUND AT THE TOP OF THE PHOTO

  71. nadia says:

    IM A TRUE SHOE FETISH GAL! I LOVE THE SHOES! I DONT REALLY CARE MUCH ABOUT THIS ILLUSION BUT I LOVE THE SHOES MMMMM GREAT LEGS BTW CIAO STEVE JOBS RIP! GREAT INSPIRATION TO US ALL MAY HIS LEGACY LIVE ON! NADIA!nadia legs

  72. phoebe says:

    did anyone notice the face on the window in the background?

  73. lo says:

    theres a face in the window

  74. branika says:

    this is a total photo shop failure!!!!!! LOL :0

  75. branika says:

    look at r cirled pic !!!!!!!!!!!!!! jealous now!woops 1

  76. rebeca tomlinson says:

    ppl were actually confused by this????? honestly???????

  77. chave says:

    OMG!!!
    it took while for me to understand the whole thing! it’s amazing :))

  78. AnthonyVI says:

    Solution.

    Corrrrrrected.jpg

  79. dc says:

    And no one noticed the creeper in the window?

Speak Your Mind

You can add some images too.