RSS Twitter Newsletter Widgets

November 6, 2009 by Vurdlak | Share  

Reading the title, and understanding it came directly from me, I suppose adds some weight to the actual Leopard Illusion you see below. It’s hard for me to explain how this illusion came to be, without revealing the actual solution, thus ruining the surprise-effect for you. There is much relevant info and background for it, but for now I’ll retain myself just on revealing the author behind it – the magnificent Craig Tracy. First thing you’ll notice is that it’s not some photo of an actual animal, rather a realistically painted picture. But you’re still far from seeing the illusion. Only tip I can give you, is that leopard’s eyes were painted on a concrete floor. I suggest you examine the picture more closely before seeing this final hint. I’ll monitor the forthcoming ratings, and am eager to see if you agree with me that this must be one of the best optical illusions ever created!

Leopard Optical Illusion

Comments

466 Responses
  1. nise426 says:

    huh, that’s the longest time i’ve stared at a womans ass without knowing I was. lol.

  2. CR James says:

    Wow!! That explains why I enjoyed looking it at for so long. hypnotic.

  3. Lola says:

    That’s all? The nose is a woman’s behind?

    What do I know? It beats the hell out of the Muller-Lyer illusion.

  4. Khaos4ng31 says:

    A leopard, a woman’s behind, and also two penguins. In the middle of the leopard’s nose split, go up, and there are two symmetric penguins Curling and looking down.

  5. Poppy says:

    It’s a butterfly.

  6. Paddy says:

    Two Camels In a tiny car RWJ sent me…

  7. Shon says:

    Don’t look like she’s standing, look at it as if she’s doggystyle with her arms stretched out upward.

  8. hello says:

    okay leopard face with woman’s body, wtf? okay? but i also see a butterfly right where the nose is
    i dont even think this should make it to the top 100,000 best illusions. i dont know, i almost feel ripped off for some reason lol

  9. Bennett says:

    What straight man would feel cheated by this illusion? I can’t understand the criticism.

  10. Justin says:

    Quote:

    “Only tip I can give you, is that leopard’s eyes were painted on a concrete floor.”

    Hmmmm…Does the chandelier complete the eye? :D

  11. JackG says:

    I guess you’d only feel cheated if you didn’t appreciate how much planning and sheer talent went into creating this. Anybody who has ever tried to paint on a canvas knows THAT can be difficult, much less on a human body–and getting it to match so seamlessly and perfectly with what’s already painted on the floor is insane. For anybody who feels that this isn’t an adequate illusion, try to create a better one!

    This painting is near perfect. The only real seam line I see is where her arms are spread out, near the arm pit and shoulder (moreso on the right). It’s fascinating to see how the shape in a cat’s nose mimics this particular stance and shape of the human body. It takes a really gifted eye to envision such a thing. Does anybody know the model’s name? :P

  12. I think its a fantastic illusion!!! kept my eyes glued.

  13. Curio says:

    Um… A woman’s behind was the first thing I saw, and I’m a girl. The “penguins” thing is a bit of a stretch, though.

  14. jestoni says:

    LAME

  15. Sara says:

    that’s not an optical illusion..

  16. alex says:

    there isnt any penguins its a butterfly.. and it is a womens ass ..so what?

  17. Moody says:

    k I’m looking hard and I’m thinking well this is lame…..BUT THEN A WOMAN’S BODY APPEARS RIGHT BEFORE ME AND I FALL…..well i didnt actualy fall but you get the idea

  18. Anna says:

    Hardly the best optical illusion ever created. I don’t even think it’s an optical illusion. It’s well done, but hardly brilliant.

  19. jesse says:

    I saw the actual painting in a gallery in the miracle mile shop’s in Las Vegas, the guy who painted this has a bunch of really cool painting of painted people

  20. ivan says:

    stupid

  21. Robert Celious says:

    AAAAAAH!!! THAT EXPLAINS EVERYTHING
    wow so she was really lying there naked while the eyes where painted on concrete

  22. Chris Q says:

    meh…

    Misleading to call it an optical illusion; it’s a well-executed – but not very imaginative – trompe l’oeil painting.

    Whether it justified the effort is another question, however.

  23. steg says:

    i think some of you are missing the point here. the image isn’t hiding a women’s body drawn into the floor… it’s painted ONTO a woman’s body. She is on top of a painting on the ground, and they used body paint to paint her into the picture, practically flawlessly… it’s not just a hidden drawing.

  24. thtonedood says:

    i dont seee it!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  25. Bobbi says:

    pretty darn good when you consider the the lady is actually a real person painted along with the floor.

  26. MichaelL says:

    Biggest load of crap I’ve ever seen

  27. Cody says:

    shopped and completely NOT an optical illusion. shouldnt be on this site… this is lame.

  28. Jogos Gratis says:

    It took me a while to find out about the other stuff other than the woman body!

  29. shannon says:

    if you look on the sides at the eyes its an owl on each sidefacing each other

  30. Alain Maltais says:

    I used to draw the same thing at 6 years old…but then the woman body was the face of a cow…no punt intended…this concept is very old but the artistry is great!!!…

  31. Rick says:

    Didn’t take long. It’s a woman from behind. kneeling on the floor.
    Good body-painting.

  32. Richard says:

    Actually, this is retarded and should not be credited for a top optical illusion. It does not make sense. I can accept the fact that the artist is good and it takes alot of skill to make this, but that does not delete the fact that this is one of the CRAPPIEST optical illusion ive EVER seen.

  33. Tabitha says:

    I saw the backside but I was thinking there was some great illusion. I hate it when something is built up to be nothing. Nice drawing but not really anything great.

  34. fg says:

    whoah is that a butterfky on its nose?!

  35. Hoodus says:

    I’ve looked and looked for the illusion. I just can’t see it……HELP it’s driving me nuts.

  36. Labneni says:

    Well, honestly I can see the woman, she’s sitting and the Y going from its mouth up to its nose looks like her panties. and a bit further up where it starts to give patterns again is her hair, her arms are stretched out, and if you focus you can see, next to the nose, her legs sticking out a bit, going away from us^^

  37. soccer023maniac says:

    thanks StfMG, i never would have figured this shit out!

  38. notillusion says:

    i don’t think this can be considered an optical illusion. the guy used a woman’s back as his canvas, thus totally transforming it!

  39. pirate-vampire says:

    Thanks for the link, StfMG! I knew it was a lady’s ass, but I didn’t know HOW!

  40. صور says:

    good pic free art

  41. It’s an owl that i see beyond the leopard.=D
    Such beautiful eyes.

  42. renz hije says:

    that’s looks great!!!!!!

  43. NBISaladin says:

    Read the whole tread before posting, please…
    There are no Owls, penguins or damn bustterflies.
    Solution is here (and of course it’s an optical illusion, morons. WTF else??):
    http://www.moillusions.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/bestbodypaint.jpg

  44. Tossinnbissaladin says:

    Morons? Inevitable label of the few who see the simple vocabulary error and make the unremarkable observation without arrogance or exaggeration. This is an example of “camouflage”, not “optical illusion”. True to form, the ignorant majority will not be victimized with the truth when they can impose falsehood requires no thought, doubt, verification, or learning. That is the script of human society and it is repeated millions of times each day. Don’t worry though, you aren’t morons; just average ignorant humans.

  45. naomi says:

    I love how everybody who considers themselves an art connoisseur feels like they have to talk shit to those who dont like it by employing their dictionary and making statements to make themselves look more inelegant by using bigger words..

    who cares about the effort, who cares what it is, if it speaks to you great, if not…move on..its all about how one interprets the piece.

    personally i think it sucks…but im looking at it online. Had I seen this at a show, it might appeal to me differently.

    but one thing to remember is that art is art and is different to everybody. And nobody can judge anybody for liking it/disliking it. Its all in how one perceives it.

  46. MherMg says:

    Wow amazing piece of work.. It’s really pretty hard to figure out the illusion.

  47. kayla says:

    lol @ cody saying it’s shopped.
    the artist who did this is absolutely amazing. he has many other pieces as well.

Speak Your Mind