Comments on: Aihara Kenji’s Stereogram Illusion

By: rigel

rigel — Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:55:50 +0000

IF is a stereogram, is the most difficult of all. I can see stereograms with just a quick glance instantly, but this in my opinion is not a stereogram.

By: cutsie

cutsie — Fri, 20 May 2011 23:06:08 +0000

i <3 these things! =D

By: Veggies

Veggies — Mon, 07 Feb 2011 12:31:11 +0000

It`s a fail I know what your talking about.

By: Skyler

Skyler — Thu, 09 Dec 2010 16:33:32 +0000

Ya it is.

By: Gryphon

Gryphon — Wed, 06 Oct 2010 00:07:12 +0000

Yeah, I’m really, really good at these, and I can’t see this in ’3D’ at all. I can make out a faint shape of a boy without the focusing trick, but nothing else. Stereogram FAIL.

By: Poch333

Poch333 — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 03:40:26 +0000

THIS IS NOT A STEREOGRAM

By: Isabel

Isabel — Sun, 11 Apr 2010 09:30:39 +0000

yer, i don’t lyk this one (no offence) but it’s really obvious and its not even a sterogram (optical illution)

By: Rorschainstein

Rorschainstein — Sun, 11 Apr 2010 01:15:27 +0000

Not very impressed.

By: Tom

Tom — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:54:33 +0000

Am I just supposed to see the kid moving back and forth, or am I missing something?

By: Mike

Mike — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:45:33 +0000

I’ve practiced looking at stereograms for along time, and can get them to “pop” out right away. I don’t know what to call this, but it’s not a stereogram.

By: emil

emil — Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:50:35 +0000

Not a stereogram at all, i’m attempted to agree with Nowon

By: NOWON

NOWON — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:49:55 +0000

THIS SUCKS

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:58:00 +0000

Agree, not a “magic-eye” image.
I also can instantly do the ‘wide-eyed’ type (easier thant he ‘cross-eyed’ ones actually).
It’s a cool talent to have when comparing two things. At work if i need to find a missing component on a circuit board, I’ll grab one i know is good and do a ‘magic-eye’ with them to compare (the missing component ‘pops’ out at you and instantly becomes easy to point out). Works great on those image games where you have to compare two images and find the differences.

Mike S.

By: Hanna

Hanna — Sun, 15 Feb 2009 02:29:00 +0000

Nice comment Ananymous18! I am also really good at seeing stereograms, and I am 100% sure this isn't one.
BTW, I CAN see 'wide-eyed', and controll it! Since I was seven or something, I guess... It's not hard, if you want to learn (I can't relly explain it, but I'll try): If you look at something that is behind something else, but not fully, it's as if you can see through it. Also if you look at something far away, you are gonna see things up close 'double'. Once you know how to 'steer' your eyes into such a position you see things double, you can controll it and then you can enjoy stereograms even more!
Because, as Ananymous18 said, things will look larger. I have no idea why this is, it just is.
But if you don't manage to do this, it's no problem of course, you can always try to see them cross-eyed, or with the finger-nose movement.

Good luck with practising seeing 'wide-eyed', if you even understanded my explaination.

P.S. sorry if my English is not completely correct

By: nud

nud — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:38:00 +0000

yes i would agree with the rest of you, a sterogram is STEREO, two images shown at different perspectives. (each eyeball)

when you look at a true sterogram you get a psuedo-3d image.

I would put this more into a comaflague illusion or hidden illusion.

but not a stero.