August 1, 2008 by Vurdlak
Here is a hot optical illusion I just found in my mailbox. What do you think? Is this too impolite for this type of website? I find it SFW but, would like to hear your comments. In the picture below, you can see some unknown female superhero (or villain maybe?) that is almost naked and in the background there are rotating snakes, illusion originally invented by Akyoshi Kitaoka. I think I have this illusion on one of my computers in high-res set as desktop wallpaper. Really looks cool as a Windows background. Do you use optical illusions as your wallpapers sometimes? Which one? Just to inform you, I have few hundred submissions in my mailbox, and those that pass my rigorous quality check will all be published on this site. If you wish, you can suggest which type you like the most, and when I read your comments I’ll orientate myself in that particular direction.
(1 votes)
Loading ...
Okay. The real illusion is her outfit. It’s almost cartoonish, it’s so photoshopped. And, yes, I would say it’s a little too racy for the site because of the minors viewing it…. But truth be told, parents should be monitoring their children’s use of the internet anyway… And this isn’t quite as racy as a lot of the commercials you see on daytime TV, even during tween and teen shows on networks like abc family and the like. Still, it would do you good to stick to the regular illusions minus wannabe wonder woman.
Oh. And I don’t have a screensaver or wallpaper at all because I deleted Control Panel from my hard drive. (?????) But I’ve used illusions before. The 3d ones, stereograms or whatever.
haha, I have used that same illusion (without the woman, though) as wallpaper for a long time. It’s funny to get your friends confused by it :P
This is highly inappropriate, demeaning and sexist towards women. This is not what I want to see when I go to my computer, I’m deleting the widget. I hope more people will stand against making women objects and stop coming to this site.
I don’t like it I think it is very inapropriate kids look at this site and when older people look at it they only see theot woman and not the wonderful optical illusion so please no more illusions like that in the future.
Not on my iGoogle anymore..good-bye
agree with “FixitDave”. This illusion is terrible.
this is a step to far, if the picture altogether isnt an optical illusion then it shouldnt be on this site. the body art illusions are clever, this is just pathetic
would prefer to continue to see illusions here, not an excuse for porn.
all you people care to much your kids will see worse at the beach.
I don’t like this “illusion.” Please don’t put any more like this up. I want to see real illusions, not half-naked women!
Everyone who complains about the girl is a butt-pirate. Or a hideosly deformed old hag. I know you are probably not going to allow this comment, but just so you know how i feel.
I enjoy the site, though I find this one offensive. I could understand if it were artistic, however it is closer to smut.
QUOTE,”It is too racey for this website. Young kids like to look at these illusions too.”
Very true. That’s where you come in as a parent and try something that is called parenting. There are tools that you can use to control the content that your children see online. There are tools that control what you see online. It’s your choice. Be a baby about a girl that is clothed and not showing anything obscene, or be like a whiner that is throwing a fit about something that your child, my chile, “JOE BOB’s” child could see on the street, or for that matter in an add in our own public schools…..
QUOTE”Anonymous
This is dumb, please revert to good illusions, I don’t come here to see a bad collaboration.”.
Obviously you don’t come here for good collaboration either. Collaboration is the Working together of those involved(simple explanation, want the long version?)to reach a specific goal..
You’re here to run your mouth, whine about what isn’t being done and of course disagree with all that is superheroism!!! Simply because you don’t understand, believe, feel, or think that is can be.
To me, that is the biggest COWARDICE in the world. The fear of the unknown. Super Hero’s may not be real, but they still shape our reality. 99% of what happens is because we dream it. I’m making that number up, but dreams are a very viable source for daily life. Just like our super heroes. The bad thing is, no one realizes there is a hero in every one of us. The Taori would have fallen long ago to the Goa’uld if not for human intelligence.
Ok. That is just to put your freaks in a bit of reality check!! Ya’ll a griping about nothing.. NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Shut up!!!!
Anonymous
This is dumb, please revert to good illusions, I don’t come here to see a bad collaboration
yeah this illusion works, and its pretty easy on the eye aswell, the only reason why anyone is complaining about this is because they are self concious about there own looks. Go to the gym u fatties
good illusion and to all the people that have been offended by the girl, you should get a life you see more flesh on the beach and in swimming pools.
We’ve seen this same illusion many times before, so what’s the point of adding the heroine/villain lady. It doesn’t enhance the illusion, and as I recall, this is “Mighty Optical Illusions,” not some men’s magazine. However, I’m surprised that this is coming up now, not at the advent of the body paint illusions.
Come onnn, this one is silly… Stupid woman in the middle of the pic.
Here is the holy grale, big and they WORK GOOD
–==> http://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/~akitaoka/rotsnakee.html
Funny how most of the posters that naysay this are anon. Anyhow while not the best ive seen, its reasonable. The girl detracts not because she is half naked, but because she really isnt that “hot” anyways. Youd see far more skin at the beach anyways. People are too easily offended nowadays.
this is so perverted. all it is is a regular illusion and someone added a half naked girl in there! i mean, have some dignity. and snakes? that is just an excuse to put the girl on there. bad influence for little kids. i am deleting gadget from my home page.
Yes! a really cool one!
super hot!!!!!!!!
WAY inapropriate…
besides the fact that we’ve already seen this illusion before…
ewwwwwwwww
Girl serves no optical illusionary purpose. Body paint category is okay, but not this.
Background’s fine though.
I was hoping maybe her clothes would dissapear if I looked long enough. Thats one good looking woman. As for the other prim and proper comments, get a life! Its fun, very pleasing to look at and there is absolutley nothing “over the top” about this. Thanx for the change of pace.
Why include gratuitous exploitation of the female body that has nothing to do with the illusion? Keep this site user friendly for everyone please!
Works great!
Can you please provide an URL where to download different resolutions as a desktop wallpaper???
Thanks a lot!
Wow, this was stupid. Good-bye, MOI.
I think it is not offending.
The girl has an positiv effect on the illusion because the eye is attracted to her and the eye will just move up and down. This eye-movement causes the rotating snakes to work.
Maybe there should be a version with a half nude man, so that the female viewers have there fun, too.
And by the way: plain nudity is harmless for kids. It’s just something natural and you do not need to protect your kids from a picture like this.
I have seen the illusion before and I think it is great, as for the woman in the illusion apart from the fact she has a better figure than me I really don’t think it is offensive or bad for children as I know as a mother of twins my son would have looked at her as an action hero rather than anything else.
Debby x
Bit of a sad departure for an otherwise great site. This was an interesting site to show my kids but I’d be mortified if they stumbled on this.
It’s not the best illusion I’ve seen in this site… but I can’t believe that someone can feel offended with this one.
And I would like to remind you that your children must not browse ANY site without adult’s supervision.
I have this application on my facebook, and everyone that comes to my site is forced to be exposed to this trash, take it off, or i will have to remove the application and discourage my friends from using this anymore… please change… the body painting is bad enough, but at least it is art…
Yeah, it’s kind of stupid to paste a girl in front of an optical illusion but I don’t think these people should be threatening to never look at the site again. That’s even more stupid than the illusion. I knew some people were repressed but come on. It’s a human body, people. If your child sees it what do you really think is going to happen? They’ll be forever scarred for life? I don’t think so. Get over it.
I could have made that in paint 10 years ago when I was 9 and just learned how to use paint 0_o that is not a good illusion, nevertheless i stretched it as my desktop wallpaper just to make sure iwasn’t missing anything, nope i wasn’t, just a person in front of an old illusion (a good illusion no less, but still…)
I agree word for word with FixitDave.
This is tacky and completely unnecessary. For all of the posters who are saying things like “This is hot!” and “I’m liking this!”, there are other web sites out there for plastic girls in plastic clothing. Put your parts back in your pants and get a grip.
I come to this site to see some REAL illusions. This was cheap and if posts like this continue to be made, I won’t return. I don’t need this crap on my computer. Your other “racy” illusions failed to impress me as well.
For those of us who remember the late 60’s, this looks like a throw back to the pop art pictures that were around. People would space ot even more if they were SMOKING. Stick to the illusions, not the girl. MOST of the hippies have grown up.
Sure she shows less skin than women at the beach, but she has to use her arms to cover her breasts. At least women at the beach don’t have to do this. This here is just low. But however low that is, at least something was tried. It was not towards the right direction, but darn it, you can’t blame someone for trying! Now I agree with those who didn’t like that, but I do not agree on those who totally spazzed about it and quit this wonderful site. Come on! It was just ONE crappy illusion. I am sure plenty of fantastic new ones will come on this terrific site. We just need to steer the webmaster clear of that direction of eventually selling illusions with sex. Illusions are meant to be enjoyed for their own beauty and charm, not just because some sexy human being is standing in front of them. Beautiful women belong on my wallpaper, not in front of illusions to obscure them.
How disappointing.
as a young child that looks at these illusions, i must say that this is just the creater of this website being a stupid pig
Theres nothing wrong with the picture. Kids see worse than this when on holiday by the pool or on shelves in magazine shops.
Its obviously a marketing illusion to draw your eye to the product. Sex sells, but so do illusions!
Not only is this racey, its offensive to women
some people are sayng this is offencive 2 women and kids,im a both and i dont think so ive seen worse on TV 2 B honest
i like her. i would tsp her always