<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Josh Sommers&#8217; &#8220;Escheresques&#8221; &#8211; Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moillusions.com/2008/05/josh-sommers-escheresques-part-ii.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2008/05/josh-sommers-escheresques-part-ii.html</link>
	<description>Biggest Optical Illusions blog. Dedicated to visual phenomena and real life illusions. Daily updated.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:06:48 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nobody</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2008/05/josh-sommers-escheresques-part-ii.html/comment-page-2#comment-85676</link>
		<dc:creator>nobody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2008/05/31/josh-sommers-escheresques-part-ii/#comment-85676</guid>
		<description>oooooor maybe the cam is painted to look like the background hmmmm??? what do you think about that???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oooooor maybe the cam is painted to look like the background hmmmm??? what do you think about that???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nobody</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2008/05/josh-sommers-escheresques-part-ii.html/comment-page-2#comment-85675</link>
		<dc:creator>nobody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2008/05/31/josh-sommers-escheresques-part-ii/#comment-85675</guid>
		<description>its obvious that the camera cant be seen in the third pic cuz the cam is a vampire, duuuuuh =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its obvious that the camera cant be seen in the third pic cuz the cam is a vampire, duuuuuh =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ella</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2008/05/josh-sommers-escheresques-part-ii.html/comment-page-2#comment-80398</link>
		<dc:creator>Ella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 07:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2008/05/31/josh-sommers-escheresques-part-ii/#comment-80398</guid>
		<description>Another thing to take into consideration is that the hand and arm is on an angle in the photo. So the photo could possibly have been taken by a camera in the room.

Actually, by looking at the other baubles- like the red one, the man is certainly standing there- though it looks slightly like he is holding a black camera.

I&#039;m very confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thing to take into consideration is that the hand and arm is on an angle in the photo. So the photo could possibly have been taken by a camera in the room.</p>
<p>Actually, by looking at the other baubles- like the red one, the man is certainly standing there- though it looks slightly like he is holding a black camera.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ella</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2008/05/josh-sommers-escheresques-part-ii.html/comment-page-2#comment-80397</link>
		<dc:creator>Ella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 07:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2008/05/31/josh-sommers-escheresques-part-ii/#comment-80397</guid>
		<description>Also the black background would not be pitch black- it would be at least a bit brighter. And if the artist has used some type of Photoshop technique (which I highly doubt- it ruins the art of the picture)- then whos saying he didn&#039;t Photoshop the rest of it.
No I still believe that is a picture of a sculpture, and his &#039;reflection&#039; is painted on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also the black background would not be pitch black- it would be at least a bit brighter. And if the artist has used some type of Photoshop technique (which I highly doubt- it ruins the art of the picture)- then whos saying he didn&#8217;t Photoshop the rest of it.<br />
No I still believe that is a picture of a sculpture, and his &#8216;reflection&#8217; is painted on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ella</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2008/05/josh-sommers-escheresques-part-ii.html/comment-page-2#comment-80396</link>
		<dc:creator>Ella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 07:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2008/05/31/josh-sommers-escheresques-part-ii/#comment-80396</guid>
		<description>The hand looks weird- unreal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hand looks weird- unreal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ella</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2008/05/josh-sommers-escheresques-part-ii.html/comment-page-2#comment-80395</link>
		<dc:creator>Ella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 07:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2008/05/31/josh-sommers-escheresques-part-ii/#comment-80395</guid>
		<description>The third one looks like it is a Sculpture.
The hand looks fake, and maybe the &#039;reflection&#039; is, in fact, just a painting.
If this theory is correct- the painter is very talented!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The third one looks like it is a Sculpture.<br />
The hand looks fake, and maybe the &#8216;reflection&#8217; is, in fact, just a painting.<br />
If this theory is correct- the painter is very talented!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwee</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2008/05/josh-sommers-escheresques-part-ii.html/comment-page-2#comment-56541</link>
		<dc:creator>gwee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2008/05/31/josh-sommers-escheresques-part-ii/#comment-56541</guid>
		<description>4th one: The fact that the middle is clear while the rest are blurry is a type of photography called tilt-shift miniature faking. Creates really gorgeous pictures sometimes. (:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4th one: The fact that the middle is clear while the rest are blurry is a type of photography called tilt-shift miniature faking. Creates really gorgeous pictures sometimes. (:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Super weird</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2008/05/josh-sommers-escheresques-part-ii.html/comment-page-2#comment-44616</link>
		<dc:creator>Super weird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2008/05/31/josh-sommers-escheresques-part-ii/#comment-44616</guid>
		<description>HINT: For the sidewalk one, don&#039;t look at the sidewalk, look at the railings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HINT: For the sidewalk one, don&#8217;t look at the sidewalk, look at the railings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2008/05/josh-sommers-escheresques-part-ii.html/comment-page-2#comment-44615</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2008/05/31/josh-sommers-escheresques-part-ii/#comment-44615</guid>
		<description>3rd one: either he can&#039;t take the picture without a camera, or he is holding the ornament with his left hand in reality, but in the reflection, he is holding it in his right hand.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;4th one: the railing goes behind the other legs of the railing in the background. Also, the foreground and background of the picture is blurry, while the middle ground is in focus&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;5th one: Personally i thought this was obvious... the columns on the right, if you follow them, appear to go into the ceiling of the columns on the left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3rd one: either he can&#8217;t take the picture without a camera, or he is holding the ornament with his left hand in reality, but in the reflection, he is holding it in his right hand.</p>
<p>4th one: the railing goes behind the other legs of the railing in the background. Also, the foreground and background of the picture is blurry, while the middle ground is in focus</p>
<p>5th one: Personally i thought this was obvious&#8230; the columns on the right, if you follow them, appear to go into the ceiling of the columns on the left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2008/05/josh-sommers-escheresques-part-ii.html/comment-page-2#comment-44614</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 02:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2008/05/31/josh-sommers-escheresques-part-ii/#comment-44614</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get the 3rd, 5th or last ones........?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get the 3rd, 5th or last ones&#8230;&#8230;..?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
