Comments on: Romantic Optical Illusion

By: c.c.

c.c. — Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:05:46 +0000

what… how is she laying down… oh! i get it shes laying on her stomach… i was thinking “how is her leg out if she was laying down..”

By: screeching weasel

screeching weasel — Sun, 18 Dec 2011 16:20:44 +0000

@4you:

How would you fucking know how Christyn spells her name? It’s her own goddamn name.

Also, your comment is not even relevant to the illusion.

The lights on the ledge are facing down… The girl is evidently lying on the ledge and the man is standing on the ground beneath her.

P.S. Vurdlak is a dude, don’t refer to him as a she.

By: 4you

4you — Fri, 26 Aug 2011 23:53:33 +0000

Ron is right! Christyn can’t even spell her own name or comes from a whole line of family that believes what she is told.
Even in the explanation she admits she did not understand it and has thus not believed what is obvious if you notice the Cobblestone at the bottom is the ground and their shadows+ confirm what you see is what you get.
She is up in the air and would have to drop some 4 feet to the ground.
The lights on the wall also confirm its a wall!
C-mon a missile hit the Pentagon that’s why the video is never released and only one jet engine came out under a tarp.
Think for yourselves people, its no illusion unless you believe what your told!

By: boomboomo

boomboomo — Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:48:28 +0000

google homepage. cool illusion!

By: Abob

Abob — Sun, 17 Apr 2011 12:20:59 +0000

I think there r 2 possibilities. Either:
A: they are both lying down on the ground, but he has bent his body slightly upwards.
B: The girl is lying down, and he is standing below her on a ledge with his arms around her

By: patrick

patrick — Sun, 13 Mar 2011 20:09:18 +0000

got it immediatley

By: Grace

Grace — Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:32:08 +0000

they’re lying down. case closed.

By: Christyn

Christyn — Sat, 12 Feb 2011 02:37:46 +0000

Ron: Well if you read the explanation on top you would understand that you are wrong an d she is indeed laying on ground and he is below on a landing. It is an illusion and it says she wouldn’t fall at all if he let go…so how could people possibly be over thinking it if they are right? You are just an arrogant douche bag. Have a nice fucking day

By: Christyn

Christyn — Sat, 12 Feb 2011 02:36:31 +0000

Well if you read the explanation on top you would understand that you are wrong an d she is indeed laying on ground and he is below on a landing. It is an illusion and it says she wouldn’t fall at all if he let go…so how could people possibly be over thinking it if they are right? You are just an arrogant douche bag. Have a nice fucking day

By: lana

lana — Sat, 08 Jan 2011 02:30:43 +0000

You know what I think is that the sailor is sitting legs strait out its a birds eyes few and she is laying on top of his legs. the grounds bricks are placed to play tricks on your mind.

By: vinegar

vinegar — Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:18:58 +0000

look who thinks they know everything

By: The Brain

The Brain — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 19:25:00 +0000

Many of us thought it was impossible! Many of us said wrong. What is right is that it is NOT an illusion. A girl is lying down on an tile or rock ground, and the man may be kneeling down on a step! Good Job to the people who got it right. Good Job indeed!

By: Responding To Comment By bigussdikuss

Responding To Comment By bigussdikuss — Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:38:03 +0000

It DOES kinda look like there is something grabbing/holding on to her foot, but as many people have already said, it is(/may be) no illusion at all.

By: jessica

jessica — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 03:57:05 +0000

DUMB.
Dudes, she’s holding HIM as well. Of course she wouldn’t fall.

By: Musemistress

Musemistress — Mon, 31 May 2010 06:42:00 +0000

I agree she is not laying down by simple observation of the dress being pulled down by gravity, her hair doing the same thing and the bricks at the bottom being more suited for pavement than a wall.

The rest isn’t for me to say as either he’s holding her very well or something else is at play here.