By on November 18, 2007, with 80 Comments

The original question that follows this optical illusion, is how many dogs are present in the picture below? The answer shouldn’t be too hard to see, but can probably confuse you. Instead, I’m asking you – Do you notice anything strange about dogs below? There definitely is something going on, but you’ll need a second or two to process the information to your brain. Not the best illusion I saw, but never the less entertaining one (at least for a minute or so…)

Comments

80 Responses
  1. Anonymous says:

    OH SNAP

  2. art says:

    Headless dogs!!! and 4 or 2 + 1/2+ 1/2 dogs

  3. Anonymous says:

    I don’t think theres any! It might not be true.

  4. Anonymous says:

    Nice! Am I first one to post?

  5. Anonymous says:

    umm that sucks,i dont understand what the illusion is, its just 4 halfs of dogs

  6. Anonymous says:

    4 legs,
    two heads.

    two dogs…

  7. Anonymous says:

    The legs are all messed up on the dogs! The hind legs are higher than the front ones! And yes, I see 4 dogs.

    That was a stupid illusion. I know you can find better ones than that!!
    <3333 :)

  8. mfjw says:

    This is absolutely ridiculous…there is no illusion, its just a bad drawing…maybe if the feet weren’t there you could suggest an illusion…but it just looks like a drunk has had a go at drawing some dogs…and got it extremely wrong…

  9. Anonymous says:

    i c 4

  10. Anonymous says:

    i see four

  11. Anonymous says:

    this is crazyness

  12. BradelyBobJoe Jr.x11 Sr. says:

    AAAHHHHHHHHH!!! ATTACK OF THE MUTENT DOGS!!!

  13. Anonymous says:

    Similar to the prongs.

  14. king will says:

    wow first

    kinda weird one but interesting

  15. Anonymous says:

    Not bad, it took me 3.2 seconds to figure it out… do not want to spoil it so good luck figuring it out!!!!!!!!!

  16. Anonymous says:

    cooooool illusion …

  17. Anonymous says:

    there isa technically 2 dogs and one arm

  18. Anonymous says:

    hmmmmm… not sure. someone tell me please!!!!!!!! i think i might know but i cant be sure. is it the fact that the front left paw of the dog in back looks like it is in the head of the other dog?????? someone please explain.

  19. luke546 says:

    yes first one and yes i think there is two dogs that have been split and
    put on top of each other

  20. Aimee says:

    i see four.

  21. Anonymous says:

    i see 4! yeah not the greatest, but its okay…

  22. Ignis says:

    well I know what kind of trick is supposed to be but there are always 2 legs missing.
    I looks better on my google home page since the picture is smaller

  23. Francisco Javier says:

    Pues solo veo 2, pero estan partidos y desliados a la mitad xD

  24. Anonymous says:

    i see four…..

  25. Anonymous says:

    I see four, even though it appears as though there are only two. Interesting…

  26. Anonymous says:

    Wow. At first, it looks like there’s 2 dogs, but then there’s 4 dogs…it’s really confusing!!

  27. Anonymous says:

    WTF, I don’t think there are any dogs there, the lines don’t add up. But I would love the standard explanation that does not seem to be included with this illusion. WTF.

  28. Anonymous says:

    I’m not sure what to think of this one. I see two dogs and my Husband sees four. Who’s right?

  29. Maggie &lt;3 says:

    the bottom half of the dog is above the top half. same with the other. its really cool :) not really an illusion, but really cool :)

  30. Th3L1ght says:

    Yet another impossible dog pair.
    When did they start changing from bricks to dogs?

  31. Anonymous says:

    this is the dumbest illusion ive seen

  32. Anonymous says:

    there’s 2 dogs and 2 extra bodies

  33. Anonymous says:

    I see 2.

    Not er 4.

    TRICKY!

  34. Chris says:

    worst illusion ever.

    what is the point?!

    are you that short of illusions? i thought u said u had so many that u cant possibly post all of then]m a few weeks ago, just post them! there must be some decent ones there?! surely!

  35. Julie says:

    Well, my guess of how many dogs is 4, but that seems too obvious.

    Anyway, the dogs that are missing the heads seem to be actually stepping on the the backs of the dogs in front (that we can see their heads).

  36. Illusion Viewer says:

    Nice illusion, very similar to the elephant one, though if you count the total number of legs, there are only 8, so “how many dogs are there?” isn’t a very appropriate question for this one.

  37. Mike says:

    These types of drawings aren’t illusions. They are pictures from people that don’t know how to draw.

  38. P-entertainment says:

    Have seen better one like this. Anyway, why havent your brother posted anything in the past?

  39. Txisas says:

    ¿Two?

    ¿Four?

    XD

  40. Anonymous says:

    not very gd…

  41. Jan Bæk says:

    4 half dogs…

  42. xxragdool says:

    there is none because thay arent fully drawn . xx jade xx

  43. xx ragdoll xx says:

    there is’nt any dogs because they arent fully drawn . xx jade xx

  44. Anonymous says:

    I do not understand why some of you are so negative. If you don’t like the site leave. If you think you can do better, do so. If not try some manners and respect.

  45. Anonymous says:

    i see two heads, eight feet,incomplete bodies and one cat. (kidding about the cat).

  46. Anonymous says:

    i was the first person to originaly comment on this illusion. and u didnt even put it up. ur a sick bastard u no that?

  47. virtualpigmaster says:

    there are only 2 heads but the drawings of the bodies are all mixed up and in wrong places.

  48. Bennett says:

    I see 1233538929562784952784956 and you only see four…sigh…I thought you were smarter than that…

  49. Anonymous says:

    I think there r no dogs…
    b/c none of dem r whole
    I rly don’t thnk there’s 4

  50. i*is*awesome says:

    omg they have extra legs on their stomachs…:O

  51. Catsrule says:

    I see 4

  52. Anonymous says:

    I see 4 dogs love Phillipa xx

  53. Anonymous says:

    dere are 2 dogs jst to help u lot out think bwtit an luk at it lol

  54. Anonymous says:

    wow i left that stupid comment about the hand of the dog in the other’s head. i feel REALLLLLLLY stupid now…. :((((

  55. liz says:

    there are no dogs. just 2 dog heads and 2 dog tails and some random legs and brown patches everywhere. i rekon its pretty kool.

  56. Chaos says:

    OMG THEY SHARE THE SAME HEAD!

  57. primus says:

    too many puppies

  58. r says:

    none of them are complete dogs, so there are no dogs

  59. hot chick says:

    so werid

  60. sam says:

    theres four dogs in this pic cause the ones you see perfectly are probably covering the heads of the other dogs

    • Byiscute says:

      well there r 3. it took me a while to figure it out, but finally, i got it and its 3. bcuz there r 2 dog heads, and they have mostly their full body. then there r 2 half dogs. so 2 halfs, wud be 1. so 2 complete dogs, and 1 other complete dog (not really there both halfs) is 3… right??? idk maybe its 2. or none at all. i really cant get the answer. my best answer is 3. but also none. bcuz the ‘complete’ dogs, arent really complete, so none of them r full dogs… so there r either 3, or none at all. lolz. long comment of confusingness. so yeah either 3 or none.

  61. Destoyer says:

    I see 6 because or shadows

  62. Alisha and Via says:

    No dogs.

  63. ally says:

    there r accually 2 dogz wit heads and 2 without

  64. wowo says:

    THERE ARE 100 DOGS

  65. yo mamma says:

    there are 5 dogs … and theres a pigs face in the back round if you look hard enough
    and a hand

  66. mem says:

    heheh chhutiye

  67. mem says:

    there are 60 dogs

  68. FREAK MAN says:

    thers 3 cos middle dog head hidden and bottom dog body is only half painted get it LOL

    :) :-o

  69. Random Person says:

    I saw 4 dogs

  70. Trueth teller says:

    There are no dogs whatsoever

  71. Bunnasaur says:

    It seems like 4 but I think its really 3 because there are two with full bodies and the other “2″ dont have a head so its a half. And 1/2 + 1/2 = 3 :)

  72. Byiscute says:

    i think i see like 3. bcuz there r 2… but like half and half, so half plus half is 1, right? so 2 plus 1 is three.. so wouldn’t it be 3?

  73. Byiscute says:

    I only found nine :( AND I GOT MY WHOLE FAMILY TO HELP ME LOL!!!

  74. my name is 'shut up mom' says:

    Run dogs run!!The vets did more than nutter you!!!!!!

  75. this is shut up mom sister says:

    but why are they smiling…………….

Speak Your Mind

You can add some images too.