Comments on: Twin Tables Optical Illusion

By: Grace

Grace — Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:49:00 +0000

Wow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By: Jasmine

Jasmine — Sat, 05 Mar 2011 00:01:39 +0000

instead of saying the width and length of the tables, it should have stated the width and length of the rhombus’. it’s the background percepting distance and angle making us think they are different sized tables

By: Matias Hosiasson

Matias Hosiasson — Wed, 02 Mar 2011 20:00:02 +0000

yea… not the same lenght… THAT is the illusion!! lol

By: Khan

Khan — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 20:39:59 +0000

Nice Illusion. The objects in the picture are in an isometric view and the blue and yellow strips (in the 2nd photo) are two dimentional.

By: Cormac

Cormac — Mon, 28 Jun 2010 02:33:44 +0000

Eh, i measure it and um… the lines are not the same length…

By: Moshc0re

Moshc0re — Sun, 27 Jun 2010 01:32:56 +0000

Wow you all look like fools…. The width is not affected by perspective…… you CANNOT compare width and lentgth by measuring the lines on your screen !!!!!!!! this is why it looks wrong but is “true”

By: lmao

lmao — Sun, 02 May 2010 03:03:44 +0000

It’s correct. You can’t count by the tiles because the tiles get smaller as they go back. The tiles do not accurately show measurement.

It IS supposed to be going 90 degrees down because it measures perception and not actual length or width.

You guys are making stupid arguments that don’t apply with the rules of the illusion. It’s an illusion of optics and not one of actuality. The tables are very well different lengths and widths in reality but because of perception they look the same. That’s what the illusion is saying.

By: eries

eries — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:48:48 +0000

It right.. But I just cant get my mind around it, it looks so wrong!

By: moses

moses — Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:35:15 +0000

RUBBISH!!! if you look at the amount of patterned squares/tles between the width of the red and length of the green you can blatantly see that the green has far more than the red

By: DJYOCK

DJYOCK — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:00:27 +0000

Ohhh. The same goes on the picture with the yellow and blue lines. The yellow lines are different sizes, as are the blue lines.

By: DJYOCK

DJYOCK — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:59:15 +0000

OK, break out your ruler……..this is a lie. The width is not the same as the length on either of them….. Don’t believe everything you see or read…. CHECK FOR YOURSELF!!!!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 00:10:09 +0000

They are actually NOT the same dimensions. The blue line should not be going at a 90* angle on the page, but from the table’s edge, so it is not the length of the green table but in face falls short of the actual length. So even though the blue lines are the same size on the page, it should in face be longer on the green table, which it is not. The same can be said for the yellow line on the red table.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:07:00 +0000

Awesomeness! <333

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:58:00 +0000

well if you measure the length of a man in a photograph to be equal to the height of a mountain in the background and find them to be equal in size to be an illusion, then this one is too.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:37:00 +0000

Everyone who doesn’t beleive it needs to shut up and measure it for themselves. It is correct