Comments on: Twin Tables Optical Illusion

By: eries

eries — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:48:48 +0000

It right.. But I just cant get my mind around it, it looks so wrong!

By: moses

moses — Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:35:15 +0000

RUBBISH!!! if you look at the amount of patterned squares/tles between the width of the red and length of the green you can blatantly see that the green has far more than the red

By: DJYOCK

DJYOCK — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:00:27 +0000

Ohhh. The same goes on the picture with the yellow and blue lines. The yellow lines are different sizes, as are the blue lines.

By: DJYOCK

DJYOCK — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:59:15 +0000

OK, break out your ruler……..this is a lie. The width is not the same as the length on either of them….. Don’t believe everything you see or read…. CHECK FOR YOURSELF!!!!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 00:10:09 +0000

They are actually NOT the same dimensions. The blue line should not be going at a 90* angle on the page, but from the table’s edge, so it is not the length of the green table but in face falls short of the actual length. So even though the blue lines are the same size on the page, it should in face be longer on the green table, which it is not. The same can be said for the yellow line on the red table.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:07:00 +0000

Awesomeness! <333

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:58:00 +0000

well if you measure the length of a man in a photograph to be equal to the height of a mountain in the background and find them to be equal in size to be an illusion, then this one is too.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:37:00 +0000

Everyone who doesn’t beleive it needs to shut up and measure it for themselves. It is correct

By: Nick

Nick — Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:03:00 +0000

For this to be correct, you would need a birds eye view of the tables and measure them then. But good illusion.

By: jkleinrichert

jkleinrichert — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:13:00 +0000

Naruwan ("98th comment)
-----> great analogy!!!!!!!!!!!
...

Vurdlak was merely showing that the lines are the same, in context. Obviously, if you wanted to know the actual 3-d length/width, you'd have to measure parallel to the sides of the table (as mentioned by Norhild 9th comment).

But this is why it's an optical illusion people!!! ;-)
Regardless how you look at it, I still think this is great illusion and it's a wonderful....dare I say, table conversation piece?