Comments on: Nature Stereograms http://www.moillusions.com/2007/10/nature-stereograms.html Biggest Optical Illusions blog. Dedicated to visual phenomena and real life illusions. Daily updated. Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:35:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Jez http://www.moillusions.com/2007/10/nature-stereograms.html/comment-page-1#comment-92766 Jez Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:38:10 +0000 http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2007/10/10/nature-stereograms/#comment-92766 Is there an easier way to do this? Cos I can't cross my eyes. :| Is there an easier way to do this? Cos I can’t cross my eyes. :|

]]> By: Destoyer http://www.moillusions.com/2007/10/nature-stereograms.html/comment-page-1#comment-85124 Destoyer Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:37:00 +0000 http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2007/10/10/nature-stereograms/#comment-85124 It is a coppy lol It is a coppy lol

]]> By: anon http://www.moillusions.com/2007/10/nature-stereograms.html/comment-page-1#comment-83686 anon Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:55:03 +0000 http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2007/10/10/nature-stereograms/#comment-83686 Holy shit thats insane, i never figured out how to get these to work in the past, but thanks to the very bottom image i found the point of where they merge and become 3 solid images and then after a moment the 2 side images vanish and im left with this phenomenal 3d effect! Holy shit thats insane, i never figured out how to get these to work in the past, but thanks to the very bottom image i found the point of where they merge and become 3 solid images and then after a moment the 2 side images vanish and im left with this phenomenal 3d effect!

]]> By: Noncon4mist http://www.moillusions.com/2007/10/nature-stereograms.html/comment-page-1#comment-82835 Noncon4mist Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:29:02 +0000 http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2007/10/10/nature-stereograms/#comment-82835 These images are also the wrong way round to be correctly viewed in genuine 3D. The raindrops *appear* to be 3D because of the shallow depth of field (only foreground in focus), and the spider is too close to the leaf to benefit from a dramatic 3D effect. But the fly, the butterfly and the curly plant would all benefit greatly from the images being the correct way round. These images are also the wrong way round to be correctly viewed in genuine 3D.

The raindrops *appear* to be 3D because of the shallow depth of field (only foreground in focus), and the spider is too close to the leaf to benefit from a dramatic 3D effect.

But the fly, the butterfly and the curly plant would all benefit greatly from the images being the correct way round.

]]> By: John http://www.moillusions.com/2007/10/nature-stereograms.html/comment-page-1#comment-79875 John Sun, 09 Aug 2009 04:10:16 +0000 http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2007/10/10/nature-stereograms/#comment-79875 :( i cant nor have i ever been able cross my eyes. i had an eye surgery when i was a toddler so it made it to where i can never cross my eyes. lol. to bad, whish i knew what it looked like :( i cant nor have i ever been able cross my eyes. i had an eye surgery when i was a toddler so it made it to where i can never cross my eyes. lol. to bad, whish i knew what it looked like

]]> By: Ron http://www.moillusions.com/2007/10/nature-stereograms.html/comment-page-1#comment-39047 Ron Fri, 27 Mar 2009 05:32:00 +0000 http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2007/10/10/nature-stereograms/#comment-39047 These are cool, but not that impressive... These are cool, but not that impressive…

]]> By: NYCgirl http://www.moillusions.com/2007/10/nature-stereograms.html/comment-page-1#comment-39046 NYCgirl Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:42:00 +0000 http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2007/10/10/nature-stereograms/#comment-39046 Whoa, love these! It took a little trying, but I figured it out: you cross your eyes until the 2 images look like four, then you relax your eyes and let the images slide back together until it looks like 3 frames and try to keep the 3 frames and focus only on the middle one. It sounds complicated, but now that I figured it out I can't stop looking! Whoa, love these! It took a little trying, but I figured it out: you cross your eyes until the 2 images look like four, then you relax your eyes and let the images slide back together until it looks like 3 frames and try to keep the 3 frames and focus only on the middle one. It sounds complicated, but now that I figured it out I can’t stop looking!

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.moillusions.com/2007/10/nature-stereograms.html/comment-page-1#comment-39045 Anonymous Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:27:00 +0000 http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2007/10/10/nature-stereograms/#comment-39045 how in the hell can i cross my eyes?? how in the hell can i cross my eyes??

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.moillusions.com/2007/10/nature-stereograms.html/comment-page-1#comment-39044 Anonymous Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:53:00 +0000 http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2007/10/10/nature-stereograms/#comment-39044 OUCH !!! MIGRAINE !!! WORTH IT THOUGH OUCH !!! MIGRAINE !!! WORTH IT THOUGH

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.moillusions.com/2007/10/nature-stereograms.html/comment-page-1#comment-39043 Anonymous Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:15:00 +0000 http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2007/10/10/nature-stereograms/#comment-39043 omg! THX FOR THIS! i neva could view sterograms until i saw that curly plant one! now i can c them all!! the butterfly one is the best one in my opinion cause its got more 3D layers... omg! THX FOR THIS! i neva could view sterograms until i saw that curly plant one! now i can c them all!! the butterfly one is the best one in my opinion cause its got more 3D layers…

]]>