Comments on: Impossible Dice Triangle Illusion

By: anon

anon — Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:31:33 +0000

tilt you head 90degrees so the right side is now bottom then if you shined a light for there you could recreatethis

By: g

Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:54:08 +0000

Fake notice how the shading with the down column five and the top across five have the same exact effect goin in the black different angles would mean dug lighting plus there warped

By: melissa

melissa — Fri, 01 Jul 2011 21:01:42 +0000

wot cool

By: Antonio A

Antonio A — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:39:56 +0000

This is probably based on M.C. Escher’s “Watermill”. I cant find the link but u can always google it if you want to see something like this…

By: lala

lala — Fri, 13 May 2011 09:46:32 +0000

or its laying down on a table?

By: df

df — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 12:02:02 +0000

232 at top between the 2 on the left and the 3 you can see the shadow difference

By: anonymous

anonymous — Sun, 05 Dec 2010 09:44:59 +0000

cool guy

By: Javier Santiago Jr.

Javier Santiago Jr. — Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:41:49 +0000

Looks photoshop, look at the top right side that one dice is overlapped to make it look like a triagle

By: Nick from WA

Nick from WA — Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:47:27 +0000

Not photoshopped. Two left lines of dice are on the counter. Right column is vertical with the top di (2 & 6) cut out in the perfect shape such that you can see the whole dice behind it (4 & 2 showing).

By: Katie Molnar

Katie Molnar — Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:50:27 +0000

This is ‘shopped. Notice how the scale of the top-right die is so different from the die immediately under it. This is because the die “under” it is closer to the camera in its own shot.

That kind of spoils this image. It’d be much better if a depth-flattening lens were used to make this less apparent or slightly smaller dice were used going up the column to make the effect less noticeable.

Actually, you can even see a bit of depth of field blurring on those too-close-to-be-behind-that-other-one dice. Still, a nice image.

By: Kim

Kim — Sat, 08 May 2010 00:43:21 +0000

I think this one must be photoshopped. Just cause where are you suppose to half a die so that the other end of the supposedly connecting line looks like they connect.

By: someone

someone — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:08:18 +0000

Tell a ryan dynes this:
” SHUT UPA UR FACE YA FREACKY GEEK FREAK!”

Any ways… great illusion!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 03 Mar 2009 02:18:00 +0000

can someone teach me how to do that?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:16:00 +0000

Given that the di must be glued for them to stand the correct number of di for this to stand is 13. Since the three di on the top row (2,3,4) must be balanced by those on the bottom (5,3) there must be at least one hidden beneath di with 2 dots showing (sitting next to di with 3 dots). The row of di that connects the top and bottom rows are numbered (L2R and on their left side: 6,3,2,3,2.
The magic “line” is fairly easy to see between di number 3 and 2. Di 3 is slightly shaded and 2 not at all because it is on top in direct light.

By: nk

nk — Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:06:00 +0000

I saw an ad on Facebook saying “how many dice are in this picture? 91% of Americans get this question wrong!” But I didn’t want to give them my email so I could take the gay little test. Can someone please tell me how there are NOT 12 dice in this picture? Is it just something really stupid like “LOLOL there are 4 dice HIDDEN BEHIND THE OTHERS of course, LOLOLOLOL!”