Comments on: Impossible Dice Triangle Illusion http://www.moillusions.com/2007/05/impossible-dices-triangle-illusion.html Biggest Optical Illusions blog. Dedicated to visual phenomena and real life illusions. Daily updated. Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:51:08 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: someone http://www.moillusions.com/2007/05/impossible-dices-triangle-illusion.html/comment-page-2#comment-80044 someone Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:08:18 +0000 http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/impossible-dice-triangle-illusion/#comment-80044 Tell a ryan dynes this: " SHUT UPA UR FACE YA FREACKY GEEK FREAK!" Any ways... great illusion! Tell a ryan dynes this:
” SHUT UPA UR FACE YA FREACKY GEEK FREAK!”

Any ways… great illusion!

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.moillusions.com/2007/05/impossible-dices-triangle-illusion.html/comment-page-2#comment-31936 Anonymous Tue, 03 Mar 2009 02:18:00 +0000 http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/impossible-dice-triangle-illusion/#comment-31936 can someone teach me how to do that? can someone teach me how to do that?

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.moillusions.com/2007/05/impossible-dices-triangle-illusion.html/comment-page-2#comment-31935 Anonymous Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:16:00 +0000 http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/impossible-dice-triangle-illusion/#comment-31935 Given that the di must be glued for them to stand the correct number of di for this to stand is 13. Since the three di on the top row (2,3,4) must be balanced by those on the bottom (5,3) there must be at least one hidden beneath di with 2 dots showing (sitting next to di with 3 dots). The row of di that connects the top and bottom rows are numbered (L2R and on their left side: 6,3,2,3,2.<br/>The magic "line" is fairly easy to see between di number 3 and 2. Di 3 is slightly shaded and 2 not at all because it is on top in direct light. Given that the di must be glued for them to stand the correct number of di for this to stand is 13. Since the three di on the top row (2,3,4) must be balanced by those on the bottom (5,3) there must be at least one hidden beneath di with 2 dots showing (sitting next to di with 3 dots). The row of di that connects the top and bottom rows are numbered (L2R and on their left side: 6,3,2,3,2.
The magic “line” is fairly easy to see between di number 3 and 2. Di 3 is slightly shaded and 2 not at all because it is on top in direct light.

]]> By: nk http://www.moillusions.com/2007/05/impossible-dices-triangle-illusion.html/comment-page-1#comment-31934 nk Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:06:00 +0000 http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/impossible-dice-triangle-illusion/#comment-31934 I saw an ad on Facebook saying "how many dice are in this picture? 91% of Americans get this question wrong!" But I didn't want to give them my email so I could take the gay little test. Can someone please tell me how there are NOT 12 dice in this picture? Is it just something really stupid like "LOLOL there are 4 dice HIDDEN BEHIND THE OTHERS of course, LOLOLOLOL!" I saw an ad on Facebook saying “how many dice are in this picture? 91% of Americans get this question wrong!” But I didn’t want to give them my email so I could take the gay little test. Can someone please tell me how there are NOT 12 dice in this picture? Is it just something really stupid like “LOLOL there are 4 dice HIDDEN BEHIND THE OTHERS of course, LOLOLOLOL!”

]]> By: Kassidy http://www.moillusions.com/2007/05/impossible-dices-triangle-illusion.html/comment-page-1#comment-31933 Kassidy Sat, 24 Jan 2009 02:34:00 +0000 http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/impossible-dice-triangle-illusion/#comment-31933 omg never do photoshop imiges! omg never do photoshop imiges!

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.moillusions.com/2007/05/impossible-dices-triangle-illusion.html/comment-page-1#comment-31932 Anonymous Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:38:00 +0000 http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/impossible-dice-triangle-illusion/#comment-31932 Nice, that is sick! Nice, that is sick!

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.moillusions.com/2007/05/impossible-dices-triangle-illusion.html/comment-page-1#comment-31931 Anonymous Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:36:00 +0000 http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/impossible-dice-triangle-illusion/#comment-31931 I agree with Alexandra. Look at this link:<br/>http://www.moillusions.com/2007/04/perth-impossible-triangle-optical.html I agree with Alexandra. Look at this link:
http://www.moillusions.com/2007/04/perth-impossible-triangle-optical.html

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.moillusions.com/2007/05/impossible-dices-triangle-illusion.html/comment-page-1#comment-31930 Anonymous Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:42:00 +0000 http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/impossible-dice-triangle-illusion/#comment-31930 Its called a penrose triangle. If you have three rectangles equal lentgh at 90 degrees apart offset by 90 degrees. If you get at the right angle, you will see this yourself. Its hard to explain, but go to wikipedia and look it up. It will explain it better. Its called a penrose triangle. If you have three rectangles equal lentgh at 90 degrees apart offset by 90 degrees. If you get at the right angle, you will see this yourself. Its hard to explain, but go to wikipedia and look it up. It will explain it better.

]]> By: gert7 http://www.moillusions.com/2007/05/impossible-dices-triangle-illusion.html/comment-page-1#comment-31929 gert7 Mon, 28 May 2007 10:28:00 +0000 http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/impossible-dice-triangle-illusion/#comment-31929 Actually, did you notice the shading on the top left rows second and third (third and fourth by counting from the right)? It is different. I also rock at breaking illusions and HOWMADETHEYARE. Actually, did you notice the shading on the top left rows second and third (third and fourth by counting from the right)? It is different. I also rock at breaking illusions and HOWMADETHEYARE.

]]> By: matarbustos http://www.moillusions.com/2007/05/impossible-dices-triangle-illusion.html/comment-page-1#comment-31928 matarbustos Mon, 28 May 2007 00:44:00 +0000 http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/impossible-dice-triangle-illusion/#comment-31928 Differences in the size and color of the dice aren't enough arguments to conclude that the image is photoshoped. Most packages come with 6 dice and there are in fact 2 different groups of identical 6 dice each in the photo.<br/>But I still can't explain how the illusion was made. Differences in the size and color of the dice aren’t enough arguments to conclude that the image is photoshoped. Most packages come with 6 dice and there are in fact 2 different groups of identical 6 dice each in the photo.
But I still can’t explain how the illusion was made.

]]>