Comments on: Duck or a Rabbit?

By: Ms No Name

Ms No Name — Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:10:05 +0000

it is a rabbit because the “duck” has a weird tail, a strange extra piece under its stomach and on the rabbit the extra piece is its tail and the weird duck tail is the feet.
The rabbit just looks more right but yes technically it can be seen as both

By: Mr.Chicken Wing

Mr.Chicken Wing — Thu, 26 May 2011 22:55:47 +0000

its a nose with a tiny eye? LOL

By: christine

christine — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:10:06 +0000

i probably say that is a

duck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By: Emma

Emma — Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:01:00 +0000

Its Both !! x

By: Matt

Matt — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:55:24 +0000

It’s a ruck. Or a dabbit.

By: molly

molly — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:41:29 +0000

is there any evidence that reading stories including one of the animals can determine which one we see.

HELP!

By: refrainfromfate

refrainfromfate — Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:03:00 +0000

Wow, that was cool. I saw the bunny right away, but it took a while to see the duck. Now I can’t stop seeing the duck instead.

By: Kaoru Matsubara

Kaoru Matsubara — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 10:54:00 +0000

The duck is the original when you view it, the rabbit is on the right. Rotate your head to the right and you should see the rabbit.

By: Zea

Zea — Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:52:00 +0000

Yeah I have this illusion in an optical illusions book, only it’s just the head and it’s more detailed. Nice I like it!

By: Danger Machine

Danger Machine — Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:54:00 +0000

I saw it first time but it’s still cool. How do they think ‘em up? lol

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:08:00 +0000

I like this kind of illusion =)

By: Jork

Jork — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:00:00 +0000

I think simple illusions can often be the most effective because more detail can distract from the essence of the illusion. A simple line drawing can sometimes demonstrate the mind's processing of an image more clearly than a photograph.

I think photographs can also have good illusions, such as some of the "3D" murals and chalk drawings, forced perspective, etc. However, almost all of the photographs you post are postage-stamp size, and that really detracts from the viewing experience. I'd say that a photo (unless it's a very good illusion) should be 640x480 or larger or it shouldn't be posted.

For example, it was almost impossible to see any detail in those levitating dumpster photos because they were so small, so you can't expect anyone to be able to say, "Oh yeah, I can see how they did this."

Just my thoughts. I know you have bandwidth stuff to worry about, and many of your photographic illusions probably originate through chain emails or somewhere other than the original source.

By: bossy

bossy — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:19:00 +0000

first of all coll cat is a retard it says a rabbit or a DUCK not a dog.i think its a rabbiduck…lol..im a flippin genius

By: cool cat

cool cat — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:43:00 +0000

Are you sure that’s a dog? I mean, i understand the rabbit, but the dog looks more like a duck or… bird to me.
Still, vey cool illusion, took me time to spot the rabbit thoug..