Another strange conclusion I have come up with: I noticed that no matter how hard I try putting complex photos made in real life, the best response I get from my visitors is when I publish simplest optical illusion images. Don't get me wrong, this makes me real happy, because I finally understand that all you want is effective illusion, not all the bling-bling-shiny photos. Please correct me if I'm wrong! Or comment why do you think that happens. Arturo Hornedo submitted this nice Rabbit Duck. Which one is it? Can you see both? If you like it, don't miss Horse Frog, Liar Illusion, Fish Girl, before and after six beers, double meaning pictures, love shirt, in the city, jazz musician, old young lady... more in multiple meanings category!
Are you sure that's a dog? I mean, i understand the rabbit, but the dog looks more like a duck or... bird to me. Still, vey cool illusion, took me time to spot the rabbit thoug..
bossy
first of all coll cat is a retard it says a rabbit or a DUCK not a dog.i think its a rabbiduck...lol..im a flippin genius
I think simple illusions can often be the most effective because more detail can distract from the essence of the illusion. A simple line drawing can sometimes demonstrate the mind's processing of an image more clearly than a photograph.
I think photographs can also have good illusions, such as some of the "3D" murals and chalk drawings, forced perspective, etc. However, almost all of the photographs you post are postage-stamp size, and that really detracts from the viewing experience. I'd say that a photo (unless it's a very good illusion) should be 640x480 or larger or it shouldn't be posted.
For example, it was almost impossible to see any detail in those levitating dumpster photos because they were so small, so you can't expect anyone to be able to say, "Oh yeah, I can see how they did this."
Just my thoughts. I know you have bandwidth stuff to worry about, and many of your photographic illusions probably originate through chain emails or somewhere other than the original source.
Anonymous
I like this kind of illusion =)
cool cat
Oh... DUCK! Thanks for telling me bossy, now it's very clear... you ARE a genius...NOT!!!
Mighty Optical Illusions (c) is a website dedicated to optical illusions, magic tricks and puzzles. Mighty Illusions, Mighty Networks, Mighty Optical Illusions, moillusions.com,
moillusions and variations are copyrighted trademark of Mighty Networks, and can not be used without written permission.
All photos, pictures, videos and other shapes of art placed on this web site were submitted by individuals not connected with moillusions.com
While most of the submission are made by their original artists, some of them were probably just collected from internet.
If you hold copyrights to any of the illusions posted to this website, and would like us to remove them immediately, email us and we'll be glad to do so.
Are you sure that's a dog? I mean, i understand the rabbit, but the dog looks more like a duck or... bird to me.
Still, vey cool illusion, took me time to spot the rabbit thoug..
first of all coll cat is a retard it says a rabbit or a DUCK not a dog.i think its a rabbiduck...lol..im a flippin genius
This is so old
I think simple illusions can often be the most effective because more detail can distract from the essence of the illusion. A simple line drawing can sometimes demonstrate the mind's processing of an image more clearly than a photograph.
I think photographs can also have good illusions, such as some of the "3D" murals and chalk drawings, forced perspective, etc. However, almost all of the photographs you post are postage-stamp size, and that really detracts from the viewing experience. I'd say that a photo (unless it's a very good illusion) should be 640x480 or larger or it shouldn't be posted.
For example, it was almost impossible to see any detail in those levitating dumpster photos because they were so small, so you can't expect anyone to be able to say, "Oh yeah, I can see how they did this."
Just my thoughts. I know you have bandwidth stuff to worry about, and many of your photographic illusions probably originate through chain emails or somewhere other than the original source.
I like this kind of illusion =)
Oh... DUCK!
Thanks for telling me bossy, now it's very clear... you ARE a genius...NOT!!!
I saw it first time but it's still cool. How do they think 'em up? lol
Yeah I have this illusion in an optical illusions book, only it's just the head and it's more detailed. Nice I like it!