Comments on: Body Art Illusion no.2

By: chance

chance — Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:55:30 +0000

me gusta

By: annaj:)

annaj:) — Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:01:07 +0000

oh wow u r so tarded!!! jk :) nyway this is…interesting…very good job to theartist.

By: Timmy

Timmy — Sun, 18 Sep 2011 15:57:48 +0000

She should have been the front door with those knockers.

By: Chrissi

Chrissi — Sun, 29 May 2011 09:36:43 +0000

I feel that the people who are saying things such as:
“someone says:
August 8, 2009 at 8:32 pm

THAT IS DESCUSTING! JUST WRONG!”

are being horribly immature towards an expression of art. Yes, they are entitled to their own opinions. They could, however, spell it correctly, or at the very least make some kind of constructive comment or explain why they feel it is wrong.

This kind of art, whilst very liberal in nature, is still art. It’s still an expression of the human soul, and therefore should be valued as much as a piece of Vivaldi music or a Renoir painting. The problem is that too many people in the world have become too bigoted to understand this sort of thing.

It’s a sad, sad day when a 14 year old sociopath notices these things, and people who adopt airs of maturity don’t. :/

By: Lia

Lia — Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:24:41 +0000

This is very well done. Everything about this is beautiful, though I agree with some in the sense that she does not blend well with the wall and that a frontal picture could have worked better. This is amazing, thank you.

By: Grace

Grace — Fri, 25 Feb 2011 22:50:06 +0000

The torso of the woman could be a bit more color coordinated to the wall. The head is good though

By: sammy

sammy — Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:13:04 +0000

this is so hot a wall with boobs… lol

By: hysteria

hysteria — Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:03:59 +0000

100% of people have breasts

By: ricardux XD

ricardux XD — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:26:27 +0000

This is very badly.

By: !!me!!

!!me!! — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:05:13 +0000

so so so so so so so so so so wrong!

By: Me, Myself, and iPod

Me, Myself, and iPod — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:58:10 +0000

Totally, someone.

By: someone

someone — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 18:32:46 +0000

THAT IS DESCUSTING! JUST WRONG!

By: Cameron Kuhn

Cameron Kuhn — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:18:18 +0000

man are you guys retarded or something?

first of all i must say this is a very good painting and i find that these illusions are… how do the kids say it? OF DA CHAIN and what not

anywho, you people are all like 49% and 51% and do research but im here to tell you that im not a hobo and i went to school and 100% of people have boobs idiots

men can get breast cancer, so theres your proof

jeez take a 6th grade health class or sumthin

excellent work vurldak on the new site and all and i love the illusions u post

keep up the good work

By: genegenie

genegenie — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:48:00 +0000

Thank you Tony Vydra
…The artistic attempt reminds me of a Dali. The work is rendered as a seated mature beauty that is metamorphing into stone wall-window(of the soul) of (her) home (and this house is old and rude with no pretensions). “Impermanence of beauty–captured and transformed into permanence.” So is a house, by a woman’s nurture, turned into a home. I see a reposing young nudewoman (the artifice of clothing would ruin the power) supporting and inextricably entwining into her home, which, with her unapologetic bosom, she proposes to nurture with her entire being.
…This is the power of true art– with or without the conscious understanding of the artist–the work compells the viewer to a transcendent glimpse of “la condition humaine.” Be it only a personal revelation.
… I would love to have this as a wall poster.
..It’s pure genius.
As an aside…for those who love art, I refer you to an artist’s interpretation of the artist’s vision: ” René Magritte. La Condition humaine. 1933. Oil on canvas. 100 x 81 cm. The National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, USA.”
Google it.

By: Josemaría

Josemaría — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:21:00 +0000

whats the illusion? i just see a woman…. haha