Comments on: Palm Tree Shadow

By: Meggy Laroo

Meggy Laroo — Sun, 09 Mar 2008 16:06:00 +0000

its paint duh im ot even good with illusions n i could figure this one out…it is pretty kool though

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:00:00 +0000

it isnt a shadow of the post because there is already a shadow over it. and if u read the post it says nothing can replace a tree. duhhh =]]

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:14:00 +0000

Freaking Awesome!!!

By: Ririn

Ririn — Sat, 12 May 2007 17:33:00 +0000

This is not a true pic. It was used as a compaign, obviously. It could have been photoshopped or whatever, but I assure, There was NO tree around the area.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 01 May 2007 01:28:00 +0000

That’s stupid. Notice the entire pole isn’t included in the picture? There could be an actual palm tree ornamentation just out of site.

By: s

Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:14:00 +0000

what about when the real shadow of the pole moves when the sun moves?

so it only works at certain times of the day?

By: Amadaun

Amadaun — Sun, 08 Apr 2007 22:19:00 +0000

Anonymous: your anagramatic sentence is ubersimple. the translation is:

In this picture the shadow is a bit to [sic?] dark although it is a great picture.

It took me less than a minute to translate, no offence intended.

the annoying thing about that picture would be that it would only work at that time of day at all, and only perfectly on one time of one day of the year. But it's still an amazing piece of art, and a great message.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:50:00 +0000

I agree with Andrew, the whole shadow is painted, the shadows of other things are at a diff angle than the “tree” shadow.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 10 Feb 2007 15:35:00 +0000

this is good but can you read this?

ni iths pcieutr het sahdow is a ibt to drak athlohgu it is a grtae picrute!

By: Point made

Point made — Wed, 07 Feb 2007 04:10:00 +0000

This must prouve that if you cut down a tree, it can’t be replaecet