RSS Twitter Newsletter Widgets

April 28, 2006 by Vurdlak | Share  

Can you guess how this magic trick was done? It looks like it’s including one candle and a mirror, or is that not all? This illusion is somewhat different than “Impossible Corner” and “Mirror Illusion”.


Candle And The Mirror Optical Illusion

Comments

41 Responses
  1. ivh says:

    A mirror frame without a mirror and two candles? Just a guess…

  2. ronals says:

    Mirror of the soul

    The fire and the smoke
    the light and the dark t
    he life and the death…

  3. Icefeldt says:

    Maybe it’s a window, and no mirror.

    So maybe you see 2 different candles …

  4. Chewy says:

    Perhaps it’s just taken in an angle where the candle that’s blown isn’t seen in the picture but only in the mirror. See how the lit candle is so close to the left? probably the blown candle’s just off to the side of it.

  5. ThomasElla says:

    Well, first of all, I question the validity of this illusion because it’s obviously been edited in Photoshop or a different program, considering that the flame is colored and everything else is strictly grayscale.

    If we assume that the effect is real, then the frame just leads to another room, or the angle of the shot or the mirror or both has been messed with so that the mirror reflects a second candle.

  6. Jason says:

    ^ Ooohhh… Good one, Chewy.

  7. Farted says:

    I think the mirror isn’t there. I think it’s a picture in the frame of a candle blown out, and then a candle lit up.

  8. leftie2 says:

    I think that ThomasElla has the most logical answer. Look closely, everything(other than the flame) is unusually grey.

  9. toni ramos says:

    photoshop…

  10. jozy says:

    Who ever can’t tell that it was a pic of a candle that had been blown out is slow. You can tell the flame was photoshoped every thing is black and white. The only color in the pic is the vivid flame.

  11. Chain says:

    ThomasElla points out that since parts of the image has been desaturated to make it more artistic does not qualify as an argument that it’s a fake. All images here has at some point been through an image editing program of some sort (like Photoshop) – if nothing else to “clean up” and crop/resize. This doesn’t mean the subject is fake.

    This is a very possible illusion. Eigther with a glass in the frame (you see the dirt, so it’s not just an empty frame), or with a trick of angle/perspective like Chewy suggested. We will never know unless we figure out who made it.

    I do not rule out a manipulation since it is not that hard to fake this eigther, but it takes just as much, if not more, than to reproduce the real illusion. However, after reviewing the image closer in photoshop i find nothing that suggest a manipulation, and if it is, it’s a good one. I don’t bother going into a detailed discussion since then i would make this post a mile long(er). ;)

    leftie2: it’s grey because the color has been removed to make the flame more of a focal point and make the artistic effect stronger. This is not a side-effect of a “fake” but a deliberate artistic choice.
    toni ramos: baseless comment, i hate it when people throw that word around without any knowledge in the area.

  12. yngirl says:

    uhh…i say photoshopped..=/

  13. Paper says:

    i agree with chewy

  14. BillyBob says:

    Just have one word to say: “Pepper’s Ghost”. OK, maybe 2 words, anyway, look it up on google…I learned about it in physics, our teacher showed it to us and freaked us out

  15. Hai says:

    ivh’s thought was the first thing that came to my mind

  16. lulu says:

    photoshop lads!

    xx

  17. GreenDayGirl10123 says:

    its 2 pics of candles and then put side by side. im telling u. i saw it on TV before.

  18. Spença says:

    Yes, this has been photoshopped to make everything grayscale except the flame. But that doesn’t mean it’s not a real photo! Like Chewy said, there are two candles, but the camera is taken at an angle that you can’t see the blown out candle anywhere except the mirror. Look closely: you can see some smoke wafting toward the flaming candle.

  19. loser says:

    just like life:
    the out side you look like your on fire, happy
    but on the inside you dont really care….
    =^.^=

  20. Dudeman says:

    I think it is easy. It is the angle. The candle with the flame is in the front. The one blown out is further behind. Due to the mirror and the angle it appears to be the same candle in the mirror.

  21. tsunei_09 says:

    i go with the mirror frame without the mirror idea…sorry to all who think otherwise…

  22. Lay-Lay says:

    i agree w/ ivh.

  23. Lynn says:

    I think that everyone who says that this is not a “real illusion” should stop and think about what they are saying. Just because something is edited doesn’t mean that it cannot qualify as an illusion. Enjoy! Don’t berate!

  24. asheeolee says:

    don’t just assume everything is made using photoshop… i hate when people do that. take the time to think about all the possibilities.

  25. beth says:

    its simple! it is a candle that is it, and a picture of a candle that is not lit!

  26. Tori says:

    is the burned out one a painting or photo?

  27. Chezzie says:

    Hi! I love this illusion and made a background with it [here]. Love the site and thank you for bringing us illusions every day, even though people sometimes say they are bad illusions…

  28. Anonymous says:

    Double exposure. First the scene is dark and an exposure is made for the flame, then the scene is lit and the candle is blown out for the second exposure.

  29. pirategirl says:

    cool

  30. Noneyabeezwax says:

    Why can’t anyone here just ENJOY the illusions instead of analyzing them? A lot of this stuff is really cool, and you shouldn’t have to be all…whatever about it. I’m just saying…

  31. Anonymous says:

    The Flame does not reach the candle?

  32. Brian says:

    If you look at the angle of the frame with respect to the picture, there is no way that the reflection in the mirror is of the candle in the picture. Laws of physics do not lie. Like someone else mentioned, there is a smudge on the mirror so it can’t be an empty frame. Also, in my opinion, it doesn’t look like a gray scale photo, just an old dull frame. There is nothing else in the picture that should be colorful that shows gray.

    With regards to the previous comment, if you look at a candle very closely you will notice that the flame never really reaches the wick.

  33. Anonymous says:

    I know this isn’t photoshop. Some of you people don’t look hard enough, it’s actually just two candles, one was lit, and the other wasn’t, and there is no mirror, that’s what a real illusion looks like.

  34. Kell says:

    The candles are different sizes for a start.

    i agree with ivh that its just a frame with 2 different candles.

  35. Anonymous says:

    either Pepper’s Ghost illusion, google it if you don’t know what that is, or a window with a candle on either side, one’s been lit and one’s been blown out. Our science teacher showed us it a few years ago.

  36. turtlelover says:

    that is cool…..

  37. Hazza says:

    the one on the rightr is a painting

  38. MadCat says:

    Have you guys thought the actual illusion may be colour based? Perhaps EVERY object was “grey”, and the only true colour represented was the light candle. Perhaps the illusion is simply just a matter of us perceiving it as black/white white and going “photoshopped”.

  39. Dacob says:

    at first i belived that there were to candles at different angles if u dont belive please take a look at this why is smoke blowing to the put out candle? in the bottom right hand corner of the mirror smoke is blowing to the candle

  40. Danielle F. says:

    I don’t know about you guys but the smoke looks really fake. Maybe the smoke was added later, but the candle was still out anyway.

  41. Anonymous says:

    It’s just a candle in front of a painting! you guys think to hard and too much ;)

Speak Your Mind