<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Impossible Triangle Illusion no.2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moillusions.com/2006/03/impossible-triangle-illusion-no2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2006/03/impossible-triangle-illusion-no2.html</link>
	<description>Biggest Optical Illusions blog. Dedicated to visual phenomena and real life illusions. Daily updated.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:02:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libralioness</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2006/03/impossible-triangle-illusion-no2.html/comment-page-3#comment-141827</link>
		<dc:creator>Libralioness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2006/03/19/impossible-triangle-illusion-no-2/#comment-141827</guid>
		<description>Iget it now from that moving example. thank you mysteryman25. its not so confusing now!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iget it now from that moving example. thank you mysteryman25. its not so confusing now!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lecy</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2006/03/impossible-triangle-illusion-no2.html/comment-page-3#comment-140660</link>
		<dc:creator>Lecy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2006/03/19/impossible-triangle-illusion-no-2/#comment-140660</guid>
		<description>Same shape different area placed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same shape different area placed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankush</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2006/03/impossible-triangle-illusion-no2.html/comment-page-3#comment-138380</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 13:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2006/03/19/impossible-triangle-illusion-no-2/#comment-138380</guid>
		<description>I think slope is not a factor here.....the upper green triangle is not actually a triangle its a quadrilateral....here...


http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/21/e001f.jpg/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think slope is not a factor here&#8230;..the upper green triangle is not actually a triangle its a quadrilateral&#8230;.here&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/21/e001f.jpg/" rel="nofollow">http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/21/e001f.jpg/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proxy</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2006/03/impossible-triangle-illusion-no2.html/comment-page-3#comment-136537</link>
		<dc:creator>proxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 13:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2006/03/19/impossible-triangle-illusion-no-2/#comment-136537</guid>
		<description>the hole really exist but triangle right triangle 13 x 5 doesn&#039;t...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the hole really exist but triangle right triangle 13 x 5 doesn&#8217;t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proxy</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2006/03/impossible-triangle-illusion-no2.html/comment-page-3#comment-136534</link>
		<dc:creator>proxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 13:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2006/03/19/impossible-triangle-illusion-no-2/#comment-136534</guid>
		<description>this is the correct drawing:
[img]http://oi41.tinypic.com/ilya6t.jpg[/img]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is the correct drawing:<br />
<img src="http://oi41.tinypic.com/ilya6t.jpg" alt="ilya6t.jpg" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maryadi</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2006/03/impossible-triangle-illusion-no2.html/comment-page-3#comment-133532</link>
		<dc:creator>Maryadi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2006/03/19/impossible-triangle-illusion-no-2/#comment-133532</guid>
		<description>tan (2/5)  tan (3/8), so the hole triangle is not realy a triangle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tan (2/5)  tan (3/8), so the hole triangle is not realy a triangle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2006/03/impossible-triangle-illusion-no2.html/comment-page-3#comment-131971</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 05:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2006/03/19/impossible-triangle-illusion-no-2/#comment-131971</guid>
		<description>wow, mysterman, you are mathematician, now i got it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, mysterman, you are mathematician, now i got it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2006/03/impossible-triangle-illusion-no2.html/comment-page-3#comment-131616</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 06:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2006/03/19/impossible-triangle-illusion-no-2/#comment-131616</guid>
		<description>Thank you Mysteryman and all the others who gave this one away to me.  I just COULDN&#039;T figure it out, and it was driving me nuts, causing me to question my sanity and the basic rules of geometry.  Now I can sleep peacefully again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Mysteryman and all the others who gave this one away to me.  I just COULDN&#8217;T figure it out, and it was driving me nuts, causing me to question my sanity and the basic rules of geometry.  Now I can sleep peacefully again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fergie</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2006/03/impossible-triangle-illusion-no2.html/comment-page-3#comment-131292</link>
		<dc:creator>Fergie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 20:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2006/03/19/impossible-triangle-illusion-no-2/#comment-131292</guid>
		<description>Thank u Mysteryman25! Wish u were my math teacher lolz!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank u Mysteryman25! Wish u were my math teacher lolz!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yaya</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2006/03/impossible-triangle-illusion-no2.html/comment-page-3#comment-130044</link>
		<dc:creator>yaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2006/03/19/impossible-triangle-illusion-no-2/#comment-130044</guid>
		<description>thanks to Mysteryman25!!! now i got it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks to Mysteryman25!!! now i got it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mysteryman25</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2006/03/impossible-triangle-illusion-no2.html/comment-page-3#comment-129153</link>
		<dc:creator>Mysteryman25</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2006/03/19/impossible-triangle-illusion-no-2/#comment-129153</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a solution to this conundrum:

[img]http://i.imgur.com/O85n1.gif[/img]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a solution to this conundrum:</p>
<p><img src="http://i.imgur.com/O85n1.gif" alt="O85n1.gif" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miranda</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2006/03/impossible-triangle-illusion-no2.html/comment-page-2#comment-128776</link>
		<dc:creator>miranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2006/03/19/impossible-triangle-illusion-no-2/#comment-128776</guid>
		<description>you are wrong. these figures are not a triangle. they seems to be a triangle but in fact they are 2 different quadrangle. (this is an illusion, remember?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are wrong. these figures are not a triangle. they seems to be a triangle but in fact they are 2 different quadrangle. (this is an illusion, remember?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: illusionman</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2006/03/impossible-triangle-illusion-no2.html/comment-page-3#comment-128104</link>
		<dc:creator>illusionman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2006/03/19/impossible-triangle-illusion-no-2/#comment-128104</guid>
		<description>The key to the puzzle is the fact that neither of the 13×5 &quot;triangles&quot; is truly a triangle, because what would be the hypotenuse is bent. In other words, the hypotenuse does not maintain a consistent slope, even though it may appear that way to the human eye. A true 13 × 5 triangle cannot be created from the given component parts.

The four figures (the yellow, red, blue and green shapes) total 32 units of area, but the triangles are 13 wide and 5 tall, so it seems, that the area should be S=\frac{13\cdot5}{2}=32.5 units. But the blue triangle has a ratio of 5:2 (=2.5:1), while the red triangle has the ratio 8:3 (≈2.667:1), and these are not the same ratio. So the apparent combined hypotenuse in each figure is actually bent.

The amount of bending is around 1/28th of a unit (1.245364267°), which is difficult to see on the diagram of this puzzle. Note the grid point where the red and blue hypotenuses meet, and compare it to the same point on the other figure; the edge is slightly over or under the mark. Overlaying the hypotenuses from both figures results in a very thin parallelogram with the area of exactly one grid square, the same area &quot;missing&quot; from the second figure.

According to Martin Gardner,[1]the puzzle was invented by a New York City amateur magician Paul Curry in 1953. The principle of a dissection paradox has however been known since the 1860s.

The integer dimensions of the parts of the puzzle (2, 3, 5, 8, 13) are successive Fibonacci numbers. Many other geometric dissection puzzles are based on a few simple properties of the famous Fibonacci sequence.[2]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key to the puzzle is the fact that neither of the 13×5 &#8220;triangles&#8221; is truly a triangle, because what would be the hypotenuse is bent. In other words, the hypotenuse does not maintain a consistent slope, even though it may appear that way to the human eye. A true 13 × 5 triangle cannot be created from the given component parts.</p>
<p>The four figures (the yellow, red, blue and green shapes) total 32 units of area, but the triangles are 13 wide and 5 tall, so it seems, that the area should be S=\frac{13\cdot5}{2}=32.5 units. But the blue triangle has a ratio of 5:2 (=2.5:1), while the red triangle has the ratio 8:3 (≈2.667:1), and these are not the same ratio. So the apparent combined hypotenuse in each figure is actually bent.</p>
<p>The amount of bending is around 1/28th of a unit (1.245364267°), which is difficult to see on the diagram of this puzzle. Note the grid point where the red and blue hypotenuses meet, and compare it to the same point on the other figure; the edge is slightly over or under the mark. Overlaying the hypotenuses from both figures results in a very thin parallelogram with the area of exactly one grid square, the same area &#8220;missing&#8221; from the second figure.</p>
<p>According to Martin Gardner,[1]the puzzle was invented by a New York City amateur magician Paul Curry in 1953. The principle of a dissection paradox has however been known since the 1860s.</p>
<p>The integer dimensions of the parts of the puzzle (2, 3, 5, 8, 13) are successive Fibonacci numbers. Many other geometric dissection puzzles are based on a few simple properties of the famous Fibonacci sequence.[2]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fossda</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2006/03/impossible-triangle-illusion-no2.html/comment-page-3#comment-127529</link>
		<dc:creator>fossda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 08:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2006/03/19/impossible-triangle-illusion-no-2/#comment-127529</guid>
		<description>WTF I AM GETTING THIS WEIRD GLITCH. EVERY TIME I CLICK RANDOM ILLUSION IT COMES UP WITH THIS ILLUSION! WEIRD!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF I AM GETTING THIS WEIRD GLITCH. EVERY TIME I CLICK RANDOM ILLUSION IT COMES UP WITH THIS ILLUSION! WEIRD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://www.moillusions.com/2006/03/impossible-triangle-illusion-no2.html/comment-page-3#comment-126701</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 14:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testvurdlak8.wordpress.com/2006/03/19/impossible-triangle-illusion-no-2/#comment-126701</guid>
		<description>sorry here&#039;s the image:
[img]http://img855.imageshack.us/img855/3188/imposibletrianglesolve.jpg[/img]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry here&#8217;s the image:<br />
<img src="http://img855.imageshack.us/img855/3188/imposibletrianglesolve.jpg" alt="imposibletrianglesolve.jpg" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

